Consider the following list of statements about audits and management reviews:
1. Audits are usually more effective than management reviews at finding defects
2. Audits and management reviews have the same main goals, the only difference is related to the roles and level of formality
3. A typical outcome of an audit includes observations and recommendations, corrective actions and a pass/fail assessment
4. An audit is not the appropriate mechanism to use at the code review in order to detect defects prior to dynamic testing
Which of the following statements is true?
K2 1 credit
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
13 comments · newest first
SH
Sherell
12 months ago
I’ve seen audits lead to solid recommendations, so statement III makes sense.
BE
Bettina
12 months ago
I think both have their strengths, but they’re not the same.
GA
Gaston
12 months ago
Wait, are we sure audits are better? Sounds a bit biased.
JU
Junita
1 year ago
Totally agree, audits are more thorough!
LA
Lavonda
1 year ago
Audits usually catch more defects than reviews.
FA
Fanny
1 year ago
I feel like statement IV makes sense; audits aren't really meant for code reviews, but I can't remember the exact reasoning behind it.
LO
Lorriane
1 year ago
For statement III, I recall that audits do provide recommendations and corrective actions, but I’m uncertain about the pass/fail part.
AN
Annabelle
1 year ago
I think statement II is tricky; I practiced a question where the goals of audits and reviews were compared, and they seemed quite different.
MI
Miriam
1 year ago
I remember that audits are generally more thorough than management reviews, but I'm not sure if they always find more defects.
AD
Adelle
1 year ago
I've got this! Windows Defender and a network packet analyzer are the way to go. Gotta love it when the answer is so clear-cut.
MU
Murray
1 year ago
Okay, I've got a plan. I'll use a stream to group the sales by customer, then calculate the total for each customer and sort the results.
LA
Latanya
1 year ago
I think the key here is to consider the capacity of each protocol node and how many connections they can handle. With 6800 NFS connections, I'm guessing we'll need at least 4 protocol nodes to meet the requirement. But I'll double-check my work.
WI
Willard
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the options. Bash is a shell scripting language, not really object-oriented. YAML is more for configuration, not automation. I think I need to double-check the requirements to make sure I understand them fully before answering.