Discuss ISQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam Topic 1 Question 86

Which of the following statements describing the consequences of specifying test conditions at a detailed level is NOT true?

K2 1 credit

AIn an environment where the test basis is continuously changing, it is recommended to specify test conditions at a detailed level in order to achieve a better maintainability

BThe specification of test conditions at a detailed level can be effective when no formal requirements or other development work products are available

CThe specification of test conditions at a detailed level can require the implementation of an adequate level of formality across the team

DFor system testing, the specification of test conditions at a detailed level, carried out early in the project as soon as the test basis is established, can contribute to defect prevention

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

19 comments · newest first

Edna 10 months ago

Wait, D says early testing prevents defects? Really?

Leontine 10 months ago

C makes sense, but isn't that a bit too formal for agile teams?

Laurel 10 months ago

I disagree, it can actually complicate things.

Cherelle 11 months ago

B seems a bit off, how can you test without formal requirements?

Adell 11 months ago

A detailed level helps with maintainability for sure.

Cordelia 11 months ago

I vaguely remember that detailed specifications for system testing can help with defect prevention, but I wonder if doing it too early could backfire.

Aron 11 months ago

I feel like option C might be the one that's not true, but I can't recall if detailed specifications actually require more formality across the team.

Sharika 11 months ago

I think option B sounds familiar; it seems like we practiced a question about how detailed specifications can help when there are no formal requirements.

Shizue 12 months ago

I remember discussing how specifying test conditions in detail can help with maintainability, but I'm not sure if that's always true in changing environments.

Alica 12 months ago

For system testing, specifying test conditions early on can help prevent defects, so that seems like a good strategy. I'll mark that one.

Aileen 12 months ago

Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to identify which statement is NOT true about the consequences of detailed test condition specification.

Aileen 1 year ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording here. I'll need to make sure I understand the differences between the options before selecting an answer.

Tennie 1 year ago

This question seems a bit tricky. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about the implications of specifying test conditions at a detailed level.

Rickie 1 year ago

I'm not sure, but I think B is the correct answer

Joaquin 1 year ago

I'm leaning towards D actually

Marquetta 1 year ago

I disagree, I believe it's C

Benedict 1 year ago

Wait, if the test basis is continuously changing, wouldn't it be a pain to update all those detailed test conditions? That sounds like a recipe for endless maintenance.

Gregg 1 year ago

↳ replying to Benedict

A) In an environment where the test basis is continuously changing, it is recommended to specify test conditions at a detailed level in order to achieve a better maintainability

Royce 1 year ago

I think the answer is A

iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 1 Question 86 Discussion