Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 1 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 1
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

You are estimating the effort for the integration testing activities of a new project. Consider the following factors, which can affect that estimation:

. Availability of re-usable test systems and documentation from previous, similar projects

2. Unexpected timing of components arrival

3. Stability of the integration test team (no turnover)

4. Many and geographically distributed sub-teams

Which of the following statements is true?

K2 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Viva
2 months ago
Haha, this question is a real brain-teaser! I'm going to have to go with my gut on this one and say B. II and III can be the real troublemakers, but I and IV should help keep things on track. Though I can't help but imagine the integration team trying to coordinate via a series of interpretive dances, just to keep those sub-teams in sync!
upvoted 0 times
Rosann
2 months ago
Interesting perspective. It's definitely a tricky question to navigate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
2 months ago
I would go with D. II and IV can really throw a wrench in the estimation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to consider those factors when estimating effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
2 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. II and III can cause some issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernadine
3 months ago
Wait, wait, wait... is this a trick question? I'm going to go with D, just to be safe. II and IV can mess things up, but III and the team should keep it together. Though I'm not sure I trust those 'geographically distributed sub-teams' - sounds like a recipe for disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Lavera
1 months ago
Yeah, those sub-teams could make things tricky. But as long as the team stays stable, we should be okay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
1 months ago
I agree, having a stable team is crucial for accurate estimation. Those geographically distributed sub-teams could definitely be a challenge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
2 months ago
I think D is the safest option. II and IV can cause issues, but having a stable team (III) is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ramonita
3 months ago
Oh, this is a test of my integration skills alright! I'd say II and IV can be the real tricky ones, but III and the team stability should help keep things on track. Fingers crossed!
upvoted 0 times
Valentine
2 months ago
Let's hope for the best and rely on III to keep things on track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
2 months ago
Yeah, II and IV can definitely throw a wrench in our estimation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
2 months ago
I think III and the team stability are crucial for this project.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gayla
3 months ago
Aha, got it! Factors II and III can negatively affect the estimation, while I and IV usually favor the accuracy. This is going to be a close one, gotta be on my toes for this one.
upvoted 0 times
Ellen
2 months ago
Definitely, we need to consider all these factors when estimating integration testing effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
2 months ago
We need to make sure we account for those factors to get an accurate estimation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Factors II and III can really throw off the estimation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
2 months ago
But having re-usable test systems and stable team usually helps with accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) I. and II. can negatively affect the estimation III. and IV. usually favor the accuracy of the estimation effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Factors II and III can really throw off the estimation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) I. and II. can negatively affect the estimation III. and IV. usually favor the accuracy of the estimation effort
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shantay
3 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. Looks like factors I and II can negatively impact the estimation, while III and IV can actually help with the accuracy. Gotta watch out for those surprise component arrivals!
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
4 months ago
But having stable integration test team and re-usable systems can help make the estimation more accurate, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's hard to plan for something you can't predict.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
4 months ago
I think unexpected timing of components arrival can really mess up the estimation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel