iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam

Question #: 72
Topic #: 1

[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

For which of the following activities would the costs be classified as a cost of detection? K2 1 credit

AWriting test specifications according to the test design

BTraining developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project

CRe-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect

DFixing field failures

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Elmira at Sep 14, 2024, 11:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Annabelle

6 months ago

B is more about prevention, not detection!

upvoted 0 times

...

Genevive

6 months ago

Wait, are we sure about C? Seems a bit off to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Donette

6 months ago

No way, D is not a detection cost!

upvoted 0 times

...

Levi

7 months ago

I think A could also fit, but not as clearly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristel

7 months ago

C is definitely a cost of detection.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ona

7 months ago

I feel like writing test specs could be part of the detection process, but I’m leaning towards C since it’s directly about verifying fixes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yolando

7 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I think fixing field failures is more about correction costs, not detection. So, that leaves A or C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavera

7 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about training being more of a prevention cost. So, I guess that rules out B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristine

8 months ago

I think cost of detection relates to identifying defects, so maybe it's C? That seems to fit with re-running tests.

upvoted 0 times

...

Peggy

8 months ago

I'm pretty confident option C is the right answer. Re-running a test to confirm a fix eliminates a defect, which is a key part of the detection process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elke

8 months ago

I'm a bit unsure between options A and C. Writing test specs could be considered a detection cost, but re-running a test to verify a fix seems more directly related.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aileen

8 months ago

I think option C about re-running a test case to verify a fix is the detection cost here. That makes the most sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarina

8 months ago

Okay, let's think this through. Detection costs are related to finding defects, so I'm guessing the right answer has to do with testing or verifying fixes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sang

8 months ago

This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the concepts of detection costs before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edison

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the deployment guidelines for FusionAccess to make sure I don't miss any important details.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

2 years ago

Wait, so we're not supposed to just guess randomly and hope for the best? Darn, there goes my test-taking strategy...

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonette

2 years ago

C is the way to go! Verifying a fix is like double-checking your work - gotta love that attention to detail.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ira

2 years ago

I'm going with D. Fixing field failures is clearly a cost of detection, right?

upvoted 0 times

Thad

2 years ago

C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

2 years ago

B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project

upvoted 0 times

...

Freeman

2 years ago

A) Writing test specifications according to the test design

upvoted 0 times

...

Titus

2 years ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. B seems reasonable too, training developers could help detect issues earlier.

upvoted 0 times

Phil

2 years ago

D) Fixing field failures

upvoted 0 times

...

Timothy

2 years ago

C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect

upvoted 0 times

...

Myong

2 years ago

A) Writing test specifications according to the test design

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

2 years ago

I'm not sure, but I think option D, fixing field failures, could also be considered a cost of detection because it involves identifying and correcting defects in the field.

upvoted 0 times

...