Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion

For which of the following activities would the costs be classified as a cost of detection? K2 1 credit
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
D) Fixing field failures

iSQI CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Exam - Topic 1 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 1
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

For which of the following activities would the costs be classified as a cost of detection? K2 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Elmira at Sep 14, 2024, 11:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Annabelle
9 months ago
B is more about prevention, not detection!
upvoted 0 times
...
Genevive
9 months ago
Wait, are we sure about C? Seems a bit off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
9 months ago
No way, D is not a detection cost!
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
10 months ago
I think A could also fit, but not as clearly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
10 months ago
C is definitely a cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ona
10 months ago
I feel like writing test specs could be part of the detection process, but I’m leaning towards C since it’s directly about verifying fixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I think fixing field failures is more about correction costs, not detection. So, that leaves A or C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about training being more of a prevention cost. So, I guess that rules out B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
11 months ago
I think cost of detection relates to identifying defects, so maybe it's C? That seems to fit with re-running tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggy
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident option C is the right answer. Re-running a test to confirm a fix eliminates a defect, which is a key part of the detection process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
11 months ago
I'm a bit unsure between options A and C. Writing test specs could be considered a detection cost, but re-running a test to verify a fix seems more directly related.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
11 months ago
I think option C about re-running a test case to verify a fix is the detection cost here. That makes the most sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
11 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. Detection costs are related to finding defects, so I'm guessing the right answer has to do with testing or verifying fixes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
11 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the concepts of detection costs before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the deployment guidelines for FusionAccess to make sure I don't miss any important details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
2 years ago
Wait, so we're not supposed to just guess randomly and hope for the best? Darn, there goes my test-taking strategy...
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
2 years ago
C is the way to go! Verifying a fix is like double-checking your work - gotta love that attention to detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
2 years ago
I'm going with D. Fixing field failures is clearly a cost of detection, right?
upvoted 0 times
Thad
2 years ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
2 years ago
B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
2 years ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Titus
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. B seems reasonable too, training developers could help detect issues earlier.
upvoted 0 times
Phil
2 years ago
D) Fixing field failures
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 years ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Myong
2 years ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kris
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D, fixing field failures, could also be considered a cost of detection because it involves identifying and correcting defects in the field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
2 years ago
I think the answer is C. Re-running a test case to verify a fix is definitely a cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
Daniel
2 years ago
D) Fixing field failures
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
2 years ago
C) Re-running a test case, during the system testing phase, to verify that a fix eliminates a previously found defect
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
2 years ago
B) Training developers to better understand the new features of the coding language they will use on the project
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
2 years ago
A) Writing test specifications according to the test design
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geoffrey
2 years ago
I agree with Rodolfo, option C involves detecting defects so it would be classified as a cost of detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
2 years ago
I think the cost of detection would be for option C, re-running a test case to verify a fix.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel