Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTAL-TAE Exam - Topic 9 Question 28 Discussion

A defect in a SUT has been resolved and validated by an automated defect re-test in the current release of the software. This retest has now been added to the automated regression test suite.Which statement BEST describes a reason why this defect could re-occur in future releases?
C) The automated regression test suite is not run consistently for future releases.
A) Automated defect confirmation testing is not effective at confirming that the resolved defect will continue to work in future releases
B) The configuration management process does not properly control the synchronization between software archives
D) The automated regression test suite has a narrower scope of functionality

iSQI CTAL-TAE Exam - Topic 9 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TAE exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 9
[All CTAL-TAE Questions]

A defect in a SUT has been resolved and validated by an automated defect re-test in the current release of the software. This retest has now been added to the automated regression test suite.

Which statement BEST describes a reason why this defect could re-occur in future releases?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cyril at Jun 01, 2022, 01:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Hermila
9 months ago
D could be a problem too, narrower scope means more risk of missing defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
9 months ago
Wait, how can we be sure the regression suite covers everything?
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
9 months ago
A is a bit misleading, automated tests can be effective if done right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
10 months ago
I disagree, B is the real issue. Configuration management is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
10 months ago
C makes sense, if the tests aren't run, issues can slip through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
10 months ago
Option D sounds familiar too; if the regression suite is limited in scope, it could definitely miss some defects. I’m torn between that and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the consistency of running tests was key, so I feel like option C might be the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
10 months ago
I think option B could be a strong contender since poor configuration management can lead to issues in future releases, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
11 months ago
I remember discussing how automated tests might not catch all edge cases, so option A seems plausible but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
11 months ago
Okay, let's see. Labeling publishing roles seems like a good idea to keep things organized. And creating separate roles for each dashboard makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
11 months ago
This looks like a straightforward XML parsing question. I'll carefully read through the options and compare them to the XML document to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
11 months ago
CentOS is the way to go here. It's a free and open-source version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, so the team's experience will be directly applicable. Debian is a good option too, but CentOS is probably the closest match.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel