New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CTAL-TAE Exam - Topic 9 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TAE exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 9
[All CTAL-TAE Questions]

A defect in a SUT has been resolved and validated by an automated defect re-test in the current release of the software. This retest has now been added to the automated regression test suite.

Which statement BEST describes a reason why this defect could re-occur in future releases?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Cyril at Jun 01, 2022, 01:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Hermila
3 months ago
D could be a problem too, narrower scope means more risk of missing defects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
3 months ago
Wait, how can we be sure the regression suite covers everything?
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
3 months ago
A is a bit misleading, automated tests can be effective if done right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
4 months ago
I disagree, B is the real issue. Configuration management is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
4 months ago
C makes sense, if the tests aren't run, issues can slip through.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
4 months ago
Option D sounds familiar too; if the regression suite is limited in scope, it could definitely miss some defects. I’m torn between that and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the consistency of running tests was key, so I feel like option C might be the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildred
4 months ago
I think option B could be a strong contender since poor configuration management can lead to issues in future releases, but I need to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
5 months ago
I remember discussing how automated tests might not catch all edge cases, so option A seems plausible but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
5 months ago
Okay, let's see. Labeling publishing roles seems like a good idea to keep things organized. And creating separate roles for each dashboard makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardine
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward XML parsing question. I'll carefully read through the options and compare them to the XML document to determine the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
5 months ago
CentOS is the way to go here. It's a free and open-source version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, so the team's experience will be directly applicable. Debian is a good option too, but CentOS is probably the closest match.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel