A defect in a SUT has been resolved and validated by an automated defect re-test in the current release of the software. This retest has now been added to the automated regression test suite.
Which statement BEST describes a reason why this defect could re-occur in future releases?
Suggested Answer: C
Get Premium CTAL-TAE Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
12 comments · newest first
HE
Hermila
11 months ago
D could be a problem too, narrower scope means more risk of missing defects.
FR
Frank
11 months ago
Wait, how can we be sure the regression suite covers everything?
TR
Trevor
11 months ago
A is a bit misleading, automated tests can be effective if done right.
GA
Gary
11 months ago
I disagree, B is the real issue. Configuration management is key!
AN
Angelo
11 months ago
C makes sense, if the tests aren't run, issues can slip through.
IR
Irma
12 months ago
Option D sounds familiar too; if the regression suite is limited in scope, it could definitely miss some defects. I’m torn between that and C.
RO
Rodolfo
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the consistency of running tests was key, so I feel like option C might be the right answer here.
HI
Hildred
1 year ago
I think option B could be a strong contender since poor configuration management can lead to issues in future releases, but I need to double-check that.
DO
Dominga
1 year ago
I remember discussing how automated tests might not catch all edge cases, so option A seems plausible but I'm not entirely sure.
RI
Rima
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. Labeling publishing roles seems like a good idea to keep things organized. And creating separate roles for each dashboard makes sense too.
BE
Bernardine
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward XML parsing question. I'll carefully read through the options and compare them to the XML document to determine the correct answer.
SI
Sina
1 year ago
CentOS is the way to go here. It's a free and open-source version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, so the team's experience will be directly applicable. Debian is a good option too, but CentOS is probably the closest match.