You have been asked to determine a TAS for a new release of a SUT, test should be automated wherever. The new release will consist of 5 new interfaces and an amendment to 3 existing interfaces. The new and amended interface will be deliver incrementally in 3 sprints, each lasting 2 weeks.
What would be the BEST Test Automation Solution (TAS) design in this scenario?
You are working on a TAS for standalone application. The automated tests are developed based on a automation framework that allows interaction with GUI elements using on object orientated API. The GUI elements include menus, buttons, radio buttons, text toolbars and their properties.
Whilst automating a test, you have discovered that the GUI elements of some third party components are not identifiable by the automated tool you are using.
Which of the following is the FIRST step that you take to investigate this issue?
Consider a TAS that uses a keyword-driven framework. The SUT is a web application and there is a large set of keywords available for writing the automated tests that relate to highly specific user actions linked directly to the GUI of the SUT. The automated test written with the keywords are statically analyzed by a custom tool which highlight's repeated instances of identical sequence of keywords. The waiting mechanism implemented by the TAS for a webpage load is based on a synchronous sampling within a given timeout. The TAS allows checking a webpage load every seconds until a timeout value
A web application was released into production one year ago, it has regular release which follow a V-model lifecycle and testing is well-established and fully integration into the development lifecycle. You have been asked to implement a TAS for the regression test suite. The regression tests have been developed via the GUI and are expected to be run at least four times a month, for each planned release, for the whole operation solution life of the system (six years). Each screen of the GUI uses several third-party controls which are not compatible with the existing automation solutions. The environment for the automation will be stable, fully controllable and separated from other environments (development, staging, production).
What could be the MOST problematic for this TAS?
What is NOT a factor in considering when you are asked to ensure an effective transition from manual to automated tests?
Stephen Murphy
6 days agoElizabeth King
17 days agoChristopher Carter
1 month agoMichael Williams
2 months agoJames Moore
2 months agoAngela Jones
3 months agoMark Lee
3 months agoDonna Hall
4 months agoEdward Bell
4 months agoDennis Young
4 months agoSusan Murphy
3 months agoMelissa Davis
3 months agoLinda Rogers
3 months agoAlecia
5 months agoMarguerita
5 months agoSkye
5 months agoFrancesco
5 months agoVeronica
6 months agoLaurene
6 months agoJovita
6 months agoShasta
6 months agoSheron
7 months agoDean
7 months agoElina
7 months agoCarol
7 months agoLucina
8 months agoGlen
8 months agoHeike
8 months agoJaclyn
8 months agoCrissy
9 months agoKris
9 months agoAlline
9 months agoGalen
9 months agoLenna
10 months agoTran
10 months agoDeeanna
10 months agoLucia
10 months agoBlair
11 months agoGennie
11 months agoMiss
11 months agoGearldine
12 months agoDominga
12 months agoDomonique
1 year agoLilli
1 year agoFranchesca
1 year agoDahlia
1 year agoTawna
2 years agoHerman
2 years agoMilly
2 years agoTalia
2 years agoArlen
2 years agoDeane
2 years agoKerrie
2 years agoNatalie
2 years agoErick
2 years agoGail
2 years agoKristeen
2 years agoHyun
2 years agoBenedict
2 years agoWilda
2 years agoLeonie
2 years agoHerman
2 years agoLorrie
2 years agoTambra
2 years agoGail
2 years agoLouvenia
2 years agoJina
2 years ago