iSQI CTAL-TAE Exam - Topic 2 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TAE exam

Question #: 4
Topic #: 2

Consider A TAS for testing a desktop application via its GUI. All the test cases of the automated test suite contain the same identical sequences of steps at the beginning (to create the necessary objects when doing a preliminary configuration of the test environment and at the end (to remove everything created --specifically for the test itself during the preliminary configuration of the test environment). All automated test cases use the same set of assertion functions from a shared library, for verifying the values in the GUI fields ( e.g text boxes).

What is the BEST recommendation for improving the TAS?

AImplementing keywords with higher level of granularity

BImproving the architecture of the application in order to improve its testability

CAdopting a set of standard verification methods for use by all automated tests

DImplementing standard setup and teardown functions at test case level

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Lashaunda at May 08, 2022, 03:09 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TAE Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Shenika

4 months ago

B sounds interesting, but how would that even work?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ahmed

4 months ago

Wait, are we really not using setup/teardown functions already?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalyn

4 months ago

C is a solid choice for consistency across tests.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tomoko

4 months ago

I disagree, A could make the tests more flexible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

5 months ago

D seems like the best option to streamline the process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merissa

5 months ago

I keep thinking about how improving the architecture could help overall testability. But I’m not sure if that’s the best immediate step compared to the others.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerald

5 months ago

I feel like adopting standard verification methods, like in option C, would ensure consistency across the tests. We practiced something similar in our last mock exam.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zoila

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think implementing keywords with higher granularity might help too. It could make the tests more readable and maintainable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

5 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of setup and teardown functions in our last practice session. It seems like option D could really streamline the test cases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ethan

5 months ago

Ah, this is a good one. I know AutoQoS is a Cisco feature, and from the options, C seems to be the most accurate description of what it does.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alton

5 months ago

I think the quantified benefits would be the best way to assess the future success of the IT governance program. The numbers and metrics would give senior leadership a clear picture of the expected outcomes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stephen

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Do I need to modify the training pipeline as well, or just the inference pipeline? I want to make sure I fully understand the requirements before attempting to solve this.

upvoted 0 times

...