iSQI Exam CTAL-ATT Topic 4 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam

Question #: 61
Topic #: 4

You are testing a mission-critical system and want to use exploratory testing for part of the testing. According to the syllabus, what is the correlation between this type of testing and the risk level of the item being tested?

AHigh = recommended, Medium = recommended, Low = highly recommended

BHigh = recommended, Medium = highly recommended, Low = highly recommended

CHigh = highly recommended, Medium = highly recommended, Low = highly recommended

DHigh = not recommended, Medium = recommended, Low = highly recommended

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

Exploratory Testing and Risk Levels:

Exploratory testing is a flexible approach that involves simultaneous test design and execution, making it highly valuable across all risk levels.

For high-risk systems, exploratory testing is essential as it uncovers critical issues efficiently.

For medium- and low-risk systems, it is equally beneficial for identifying functional and usability defects, especially when formal test cases may not cover all scenarios.

Analyzing the Options:

A and B: These fail to emphasize the importance of exploratory testing for high-risk systems.

D: States that exploratory testing is 'not recommended' for high-risk systems, which is inaccurate.

C: Correctly states that exploratory testing is 'highly recommended' across all risk levels, aligning with the ISTQB syllabus guidance.

ISTQB Advanced Agile Technical Tester syllabus highlights exploratory testing as a versatile and valuable technique for all risk levels.

by Carmen at Jul 11, 2025, 03:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-ATT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Gilberto

5 days ago

I practiced a similar question where high risk was always prioritized, so I’m leaning towards option C, but I’m not completely confident.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malika

11 days ago

I recall something about medium risk being highly recommended for exploratory testing, but I’m not sure if that’s the right option here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tomoko

16 days ago

I think exploratory testing is more critical for high-risk items, but I can't remember the exact correlation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Venita

22 days ago

I've got a good feeling about this one. The syllabus is pretty clear on the recommended approach for different risk levels, so I think I can narrow it down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

27 days ago

Okay, let me think this through. Based on my understanding, exploratory testing is more valuable for high-risk items, so I'm guessing the answer is related to that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karon

1 month ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The syllabus mentions something about the correlation, but I'm not sure exactly what that means in this context.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casandra

1 month ago

This question seems straightforward. I think the key is understanding the relationship between exploratory testing and risk level.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nana

3 months ago

I think it's also useful for medium and low risk items.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vince

3 months ago

Exploratory testing? Sounds like a fancy way of saying 'winging it'. But hey, if it works for low-risk items, I'm all for it. Option B gets my vote.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felton

3 months ago

Option C all the way! Exploratory testing is like a secret weapon for testing high-risk systems. Brings a whole new level of excitement to the job.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerardo

3 months ago

Yes, that's correct. It's important for high-risk items.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

3 months ago

Wow, this is a tough one. I'm tempted to go with option D just to be on the safe side, but I can see the logic behind option C as well. Decisions, decisions!

upvoted 0 times

...