Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CTAL-ATT Exam - Topic 10 Question 72 Discussion

Which option describes a good practice when applying test automation for a Regression-averse test approach?SELECT ONE OPTION
D) Increasing automated test coverage to allow more time for exploratory testing
A) Developing and maintaining automated test checklists to efficiently execute a stable set of tests
B) Applying BDD to produce automated tests before the implementation of a user story
C) Focusing on the continuous improvement and refactoring of the automated tests

iSQI CTAL-ATT Exam - Topic 10 Question 72 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam
Question #: 72
Topic #: 10
[All CTAL-ATT Questions]

Which option describes a good practice when applying test automation for a Regression-averse test approach?

SELECT ONE OPTION

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

A good practice in test automation for a regression-averse approach is to increase automated test coverage. This allows the team to ensure that as many features as possible are being tested automatically, which can help in identifying regressions early. Moreover, by automating the regression tests, testers can dedicate more time to exploratory testing, which is crucial for discovering issues that automated tests may not catch.Exploratory testing is an approach that relies on the tester's creativity and experience, and it is an essential complement to automated regression testing123.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Daren
29 days ago
I feel like focusing on continuous improvement, like in option C, is crucial, but I’m not sure if it directly addresses regression-averse testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haley
1 month ago
I remember practicing a question about BDD, but I’m not convinced it fits well with regression-averse testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
My
1 month ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best choice for a regression-averse approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel