New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI CT-AI Exam - Topic 4 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CT-AI exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 4
[All CT-AI Questions]

Pairwise testing can be used in the context of self-driving cars for controlling an explosion in the number of combinations of parameters.

Which ONE of the following options is LEAST likely to be a reason for this incredible growth of parameters?

SELECT ONE OPTION

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Pairwise testing is used to handle the large number of combinations of parameters that can arise in complex systems like self-driving cars. The question asks which of the given options is least likely to be a reason for the explosion in the number of parameters.

Different Road Types (A): Self-driving cars must operate on various road types, such as highways, city streets, rural roads, etc. Each road type can have different characteristics, requiring the car's system to adapt and handle different scenarios. Thus, this is a significant factor contributing to the growth of parameters.

Different Weather Conditions (B): Weather conditions such as rain, snow, fog, and bright sunlight significantly affect the performance of self-driving cars. The car's sensors and algorithms must adapt to these varying conditions, which adds to the number of parameters that need to be considered.

ML Model Metrics to Evaluate Functional Performance (C): While evaluating machine learning (ML) model performance is crucial, it does not directly contribute to the explosion of parameter combinations in the same way that road types, weather conditions, and car features do. Metrics are used to measure and assess performance but are not themselves variable conditions that the system must handle.

Different Features like ADAS, Lane Change Assistance, etc. (D): Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and other features add complexity to self-driving cars. Each feature can have multiple settings and operational modes, contributing to the overall number of parameters.

Hence, the least likely reason for the incredible growth in the number of parameters is C. ML model metrics to evaluate the functional performance.


ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus Section 9.2 on Pairwise Testing discusses the application of this technique to manage the combinations of different variables in AI-based systems, including those used in self-driving cars.

Sample Exam Questions document, Question #29 provides context for the explosion in parameter combinations in self-driving cars and highlights the use of pairwise testing as a method to manage this complexity.

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Joaquin
3 months ago
I disagree, I feel like road types are the least variable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
3 months ago
ADAS features can complicate things for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
3 months ago
Wait, are ML model metrics really that impactful?
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
4 months ago
I think weather conditions are a big factor too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
4 months ago
Different road types definitely add a lot of parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
4 months ago
I agree with Kristofer, but I’m still a bit confused if metrics could somehow lead to more parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like ML model metrics are more about evaluation than increasing parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodolfo
4 months ago
I think different road types and weather conditions definitely increase parameters, but I'm leaning towards option C being the least likely reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
5 months ago
I remember pairwise testing is about reducing combinations, but I'm not sure which option doesn't fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynna
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The different features like ADAS and lane change assistance are likely to be a major contributor to the parameter explosion, so that's the least likely option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a handle on this. The key is to identify the factor that is least likely to contribute to the parameter explosion. Let me go through the options and see which one stands out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky question. I'll need to think carefully about the different factors that can contribute to the explosion of parameters in self-driving car systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. I'll need to re-read it a few times to make sure I understand what they're asking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident it's vCenter Server High Availability. That's designed to provide redundancy and failover for the vCenter Server, which would be perfect for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
1 year ago
I think the least likely reason is different weather conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
1 year ago
I think it's actually because of the different features like ADAS and Lane Change Assistance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe it's because of the ML model metrics to evaluate the functional performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
1 year ago
I think the incredible growth of parameters is due to different road types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
1 year ago
I think different features like ADAS could also contribute to the growth of parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
2 years ago
I believe different road types could lead to more parameter combinations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
2 years ago
I agree with Gayla, ML model metrics seem less relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
2 years ago
Ah, the joys of self-driving car development. I think C is the least likely, after all, who needs to worry about metrics when you can just let the cars figure it out on their own? *grins*
upvoted 0 times
Lashawnda
1 year ago
I agree with Linette, C seems less important in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linette
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe D is the least likely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
1 year ago
I think C is the least likely option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gayla
2 years ago
I think the least likely reason is ML model metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leeann
2 years ago
B is a no-brainer, weather conditions can dramatically affect a car's behavior. I'm going with C as the least likely, I mean, who cares about evaluating performance when you have a fleet of self-driving cars to test it on? *laughs*
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
1 year ago
D) Different features like ADAS, Lane Change Assistance etc.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
1 year ago
C) ML model metrics to evaluate the functional performance
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
1 year ago
B) Different weather conditions
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
1 year ago
A) Different Road Types
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
2 years ago
D is a good one, with all the different features and assistive technologies in modern cars. But I'd say C is the least likely, who needs to evaluate performance when we can just drive off a cliff and see what happens? *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlee
2 years ago
Option A is too obvious. Self-driving cars need to handle all kinds of road types, so that's a given. I think C is the least likely reason for the explosion of parameters.
upvoted 0 times
Keneth
1 year ago
Exactly, the focus is more on the physical aspects like road types and weather conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
1 year ago
Yeah, I think so too. ML model metrics are important but may not directly contribute to the explosion of parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
1 year ago
Carisa: I think option C is the least likely reason for the growth of parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
1 year ago
I agree, option C seems like the least likely reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
1 year ago
Yeah, self-driving cars have to be able to handle all road types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
1 year ago
D) Different features like ADAS, Lane Change Assistance etc.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
1 year ago
I agree, option A is too obvious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
2 years ago
C) ML model metrics to evaluate the functional performance
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
2 years ago
B) Different weather conditions
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
2 years ago
A) Different Road Types
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel