Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CSeT-F Exam - Topic 2 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CSeT-F exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 2
[All CSeT-F Questions]

Which of the following is an example of a potential negative outcome associated with Selenium test automation project?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Kenneth at May 07, 2022, 10:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSeT-F Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Raina
7 months ago
I disagree with B, automation can actually improve coverage if done right.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
7 months ago
D sounds risky, but can it really be that bad?
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
7 months ago
A is a positive, not a negative outcome!
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
8 months ago
C seems a bit extreme, but I can see it happening.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
8 months ago
B is definitely a concern, less coverage can lead to issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
8 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the answers, but I feel like option B could be a real concern if we focus too much on automated UI tests instead of unit tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
8 months ago
I practiced a question about the risks of letting non-technical people automate tests, so I’m leaning towards option D being a potential issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
8 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar; finding too many defects could definitely slow down releases, but I'm not sure if that's the main negative outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
8 months ago
I remember discussing how automation can sometimes lead to reduced code coverage, especially if teams rely too heavily on Selenium for everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this one. The question mentions Azure and Microsoft 365 Defender, but the solution is about a GitHub app connector. I'll need to double-check the details and make sure I understand the relationship between the different cloud services mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
8 months ago
I think it might be the WebACL, but I'm not entirely sure. I remember something about it controlling access based on ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
8 months ago
I've seen this type of issue before. My money's on option C - the Presence has stopped working for the user, so I'll focus on unassigning and reassigning the end-user to the Cisco IM and Presence Server. That should help resolve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel