Discuss ISQI CSeT-F Exam Topic 2 Question 17

Which of the following is an example of a potential negative outcome associated with Selenium test automation project?

AEase of running large sets of regression tests when new features are added

BReduced code coverage at the unit and integration test levels

CFinding so many defects that the release process is slowed down

DAllowing people with limited technical understanding to automate tests

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium CSeT-F Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

12 comments · newest first

Raina 11 months ago

I disagree with B, automation can actually improve coverage if done right.

William 12 months ago

D sounds risky, but can it really be that bad?

Delisa 12 months ago

A is a positive, not a negative outcome!

Noelia 12 months ago

C seems a bit extreme, but I can see it happening.

Cherri 1 year ago

B is definitely a concern, less coverage can lead to issues.

Johnetta 1 year ago

I’m a bit confused about the answers, but I feel like option B could be a real concern if we focus too much on automated UI tests instead of unit tests.

Carmelina 1 year ago

I practiced a question about the risks of letting non-technical people automate tests, so I’m leaning towards option D being a potential issue.

Tandra 1 year ago

I think option C sounds familiar; finding too many defects could definitely slow down releases, but I'm not sure if that's the main negative outcome.

Cory 1 year ago

I remember discussing how automation can sometimes lead to reduced code coverage, especially if teams rely too heavily on Selenium for everything.

Felix 1 year ago

I'm a bit confused by this one. The question mentions Azure and Microsoft 365 Defender, but the solution is about a GitHub app connector. I'll need to double-check the details and make sure I understand the relationship between the different cloud services mentioned.

Elvis 1 year ago

I think it might be the WebACL, but I'm not entirely sure. I remember something about it controlling access based on ports.

Cora 1 year ago

I've seen this type of issue before. My money's on option C - the Presence has stopped working for the user, so I'll focus on unassigning and reassigning the end-user to the Cisco IM and Presence Server. That should help resolve the problem.

iSQI CSeT-F Exam - Topic 2 Question 17 Discussion