Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI CSeT-F Exam - Topic 2 Question 17 Discussion

Which of the following is an example of a potential negative outcome associated with Selenium test automation project?
D) Allowing people with limited technical understanding to automate tests
A) Ease of running large sets of regression tests when new features are added
B) Reduced code coverage at the unit and integration test levels
C) Finding so many defects that the release process is slowed down

iSQI CSeT-F Exam - Topic 2 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CSeT-F exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 2
[All CSeT-F Questions]

Which of the following is an example of a potential negative outcome associated with Selenium test automation project?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Kenneth at May 07, 2022, 10:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CSeT-F Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Raina
10 months ago
I disagree with B, automation can actually improve coverage if done right.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
10 months ago
D sounds risky, but can it really be that bad?
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
10 months ago
A is a positive, not a negative outcome!
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
10 months ago
C seems a bit extreme, but I can see it happening.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
11 months ago
B is definitely a concern, less coverage can lead to issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
11 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the answers, but I feel like option B could be a real concern if we focus too much on automated UI tests instead of unit tests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
11 months ago
I practiced a question about the risks of letting non-technical people automate tests, so I’m leaning towards option D being a potential issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
11 months ago
I think option C sounds familiar; finding too many defects could definitely slow down releases, but I'm not sure if that's the main negative outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
11 months ago
I remember discussing how automation can sometimes lead to reduced code coverage, especially if teams rely too heavily on Selenium for everything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused by this one. The question mentions Azure and Microsoft 365 Defender, but the solution is about a GitHub app connector. I'll need to double-check the details and make sure I understand the relationship between the different cloud services mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvis
11 months ago
I think it might be the WebACL, but I'm not entirely sure. I remember something about it controlling access based on ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
11 months ago
I've seen this type of issue before. My money's on option C - the Presence has stopped working for the user, so I'll focus on unassigning and reassigning the end-user to the Cisco IM and Presence Server. That should help resolve the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel