MENU
An enterprise is currently experiencing an unacceptable 8% processing error rate and desires to manage risk by establishing a policy that error rates cannot exceed 5%. In addition, management wants to be alerted when error rates meet or exceed 4%. The enterprise should set a key performance indicator (KPI) metric at which of the following levels?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium IT Risk Fundamentals Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Setting KPIs:
A Key Performance Indicator (KPI) should be set at a level that allows for early detection and response to deviations from desired performance levels.
In this case, management wants to be alerted when error rates meet or exceed 4%, even though the acceptable limit is 5%.
Alert Threshold:
Setting the KPI at 4% ensures that management receives timely alerts before reaching the unacceptable error rate of 5%.
This approach enables proactive management and correction of processes to maintain error rates within acceptable limits.
Reference:
ISA 315 (Revised 2019), Anlage 5 discusses the importance of monitoring and setting appropriate thresholds for performance and risk indicators to manage and mitigate risks effectively.
39 comments · newest first
WI
Willard
10 months ago
Just to clarify, the current error rate is 8%, right?
MA
Mattie
11 months ago
Wait, why would they set a KPI at 5% when they want to alert at 4%?
KI
Kimberely
11 months ago
8% is way too high, but 4% seems like a good alert level.
RO
Rodolfo
11 months ago
I agree, 4% is too low for a KPI.
JU
Jules
11 months ago
KPI should definitely be set at 5%.
LO
Lou
12 months ago
I keep getting confused about these thresholds. If the goal is to manage risk, shouldn't we set it at 4% to be proactive?
EL
Elin
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the KPI was set at a threshold just below the maximum limit. So, I guess 5% could be the right choice here.
EZ
Ezekiel
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like setting it at 4% makes sense for early alerts. It seems like a good way to catch issues before they hit the threshold.
SH
Sheron
1 year ago
I remember we discussed KPIs in class, and I think the KPI should be set at 5% since that's the maximum acceptable error rate.
MI
Milly
1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The enterprise wants to keep the error rate below 5%, and they want to be alerted when it reaches 4%. So, the KPI should be set at the lower of these two values, which is 4%. I'm pretty sure that B is the correct answer.
CL
Clorinda
1 year ago
I'm not sure about this one. The question is a bit tricky, and I'm not entirely sure how to approach it. I think I'll need to re-read the information and try to understand the logic behind the different options before making a decision.
NO
Norah
1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down. The enterprise currently has an 8% processing error rate, and they want to manage the risk by keeping it below 5%. But they also want to be alerted when it reaches 4%. So, the KPI should be set at 4% to meet both of these requirements. I'm pretty confident that B is the correct answer.
CH
Charlena
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused here. The enterprise wants to keep the error rates below 5%, but they also want to be alerted at 4%. Should the KPI be set at 4% or 5%? I'll need to think this through carefully.
NA
Nancey
1 year ago
This seems pretty straightforward. The question is asking us to set the KPI metric at the appropriate level based on the given information. I think the answer is B, 4%, since the management wants to be alerted when the error rates meet or exceed 4%.
KE
Keshia
2 years ago
I bet the person who wrote this question has never actually had to deal with error rates in the real world. Let's set the KPI at 0% and call it a day!
AM
Amos
2 years ago
Yeah, that would be the dream!
DE
Delisa
2 years ago
C) 8%
FI
Fidelia
2 years ago
Haha, I wish we could set it at 0% too!
AL
Alease
2 years ago
B) 4%
LA
Laquanda
2 years ago
A) 5%
BO
Boris
2 years ago
B) 4% is the way to go. Anything higher than that and the enterprise is just asking for trouble. Might as well set the bar high and aim for success!
MI
Mila
2 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Wouldn't C) 8% be better? It's the current error rate, so why not just stick with that?
SO
Soledad
2 years ago
I agree, setting the KPI at 4% would allow management to be alerted before the error rate exceeds the desired level.
SU
Sunshine
2 years ago
B) 4%
PE
Peggy
2 years ago
A) 5%
OL
Ollie
2 years ago
I think setting the KPI at 5% would be a good idea to ensure the error rate stays below the desired level.
AL
Altha
2 years ago
I think B) 4% is the right choice. It's the sweet spot between the desired error rate of 5% and the trigger for management alerts.
KE
Kenda
2 years ago
Alana: Definitely, it's better to be alerted early on before the error rate gets too high.
AL
Alberto
2 years ago
User 3: Setting it at 4% will help ensure that we are proactive in managing risk.
AL
Alana
2 years ago
User 2: Yeah, it makes sense to set the KPI at 4% to stay ahead of any potential issues.
ET
Ethan
2 years ago
User 1: I agree, B) 4% seems like the best option.
LA
Lashandra
2 years ago
But wouldn't it be better to set the KPI at 5% to align with the desired maximum error rate?
KA
Kathryn
2 years ago
I agree with Nan, setting the KPI at 4% makes sense to alert management before error rates exceed 5%.
NA
Nan
2 years ago
I think the KPI should be set at 4%.
AR
Artie
2 years ago
The correct answer is B) 4%. This aligns with management's requirement to be alerted when error rates meet or exceed 4%, which is the critical threshold they want to monitor.
FA
Fausto
2 years ago
The correct answer is B) 4%.
BI
Billy
2 years ago
C) 8%
MO
Monroe
2 years ago
B) 4%
MO
Mozelle
2 years ago
A) 5%