Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca Cybersecurity-Audit-Certificate Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Posted by Roosevelt on Oct 09, 2023 at 06:29 AM

The risk of an evil twin attack on mobile devices is PRIMARILY due to:

Suggested Answer: C

The risk of an evil twin attack on mobile devices is PRIMARILY due to theuse of generic names that mobile devices will accept without verification. An evil twin attack is a type of wireless network attack where an attacker sets up a rogue access point that mimics a legitimate one. The attacker can then lure unsuspecting users to connect to the rogue access point and intercept their data or launch further attacks. Mobile devices are vulnerable to evil twin attacks because they often use generic names for their wireless networks, such as ''Free WiFi'' or ''Public Hotspot''. These names can be easily spoofed by an attacker and accepted by mobile devices without verifying the identity or security of the access point.


Get Premium Cybersecurity-Audit-Certificate Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
16 comments · newest first
TE
Telma 11 months ago
I agree with B, encryption should be standard by now.
WE
Wenona 11 months ago
Wait, are we really still using weak authentication? That's surprising!
IL
Ilda 11 months ago
A is a problem too, plain text tokens are just asking for trouble.
MA
Marion 11 months ago
I think D is more relevant, weak protocols are everywhere.
KR
Kristel 11 months ago
Definitely B, unencrypted data is a huge risk!
IR
Ira 12 months ago
I feel like tokens stored as plain text could be a risk, but it seems more related to app security than the attack itself.
CH
Chi 12 months ago
I think I saw a practice question about how mobile devices can connect to generic names without verification, which might be relevant here.
FA
Fannie 12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the lack of encryption in data transmission could be a big factor too.
BE
Ben 1 year ago
I remember studying that evil twin attacks exploit unsecured Wi-Fi networks, so I think it might be related to weak authentication protocols.
EL
Elvera 1 year ago
I'm a bit stuck on this one. I know evil twin attacks are a risk, but I'm not sure I fully understand the primary reason. I'll have to review my notes and try to eliminate the options.
EL
Elfrieda 1 year ago
I've seen evil twin attacks before, and I know they often exploit unencrypted wireless connections. I'm pretty confident B is the right answer here.
JA
Jade 1 year ago
Okay, let me break this down. The key is that it's asking about the PRIMARY reason for the risk of an evil twin attack. I'm leaning towards B, but I'll double-check the other options.
AN
Annelle 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Could be B or D, but I'm a bit confused.
GE
Geraldine 1 year ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the answer is B - use of data transmission that is not always encrypted.
WA
Wayne 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. Secrets are sensitive data that Kubernetes needs to store, so it makes sense that there would be some encryption involved. I'm leaning towards A or B, but I'll double-check my notes to be sure.
AR
Arminda 1 year ago
Ah, I see now. The question is asking about the objects and attributes used to get the status of the SOAP API call, not the actual call itself. I think I've got this.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel