New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Isaca Cybersecurity-Audit-Certificate Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's Cybersecurity-Audit-Certificate exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 1
[All Cybersecurity-Audit-Certificate Questions]

The risk of an evil twin attack on mobile devices is PRIMARILY due to:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

The risk of an evil twin attack on mobile devices is PRIMARILY due to theuse of generic names that mobile devices will accept without verification. An evil twin attack is a type of wireless network attack where an attacker sets up a rogue access point that mimics a legitimate one. The attacker can then lure unsuspecting users to connect to the rogue access point and intercept their data or launch further attacks. Mobile devices are vulnerable to evil twin attacks because they often use generic names for their wireless networks, such as ''Free WiFi'' or ''Public Hotspot''. These names can be easily spoofed by an attacker and accepted by mobile devices without verifying the identity or security of the access point.


by Roosevelt at Oct 09, 2023, 06:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Cybersecurity-Audit-Certificate Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Telma
3 months ago
I agree with B, encryption should be standard by now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
3 months ago
Wait, are we really still using weak authentication? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
4 months ago
A is a problem too, plain text tokens are just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
4 months ago
I think D is more relevant, weak protocols are everywhere.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
4 months ago
Definitely B, unencrypted data is a huge risk!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
4 months ago
I feel like tokens stored as plain text could be a risk, but it seems more related to app security than the attack itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chi
4 months ago
I think I saw a practice question about how mobile devices can connect to generic names without verification, which might be relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like the lack of encryption in data transmission could be a big factor too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
5 months ago
I remember studying that evil twin attacks exploit unsecured Wi-Fi networks, so I think it might be related to weak authentication protocols.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
5 months ago
I'm a bit stuck on this one. I know evil twin attacks are a risk, but I'm not sure I fully understand the primary reason. I'll have to review my notes and try to eliminate the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
5 months ago
I've seen evil twin attacks before, and I know they often exploit unencrypted wireless connections. I'm pretty confident B is the right answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. The key is that it's asking about the PRIMARY reason for the risk of an evil twin attack. I'm leaning towards B, but I'll double-check the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Could be B or D, but I'm a bit confused.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldine
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I think the answer is B - use of data transmission that is not always encrypted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
5 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. Secrets are sensitive data that Kubernetes needs to store, so it makes sense that there would be some encryption involved. I'm leaning towards A or B, but I'll double-check my notes to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
5 months ago
Ah, I see now. The question is asking about the objects and attributes used to get the status of the SOAP API call, not the actual call itself. I think I've got this.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel