Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca CCOA Exam - Topic 5 Question 10 Discussion

Posted by Elden on Aug 04, 2025 at 03:25 AM

After an organization's financial system was moved to a cloud-hosted solution that allows single sign-on (SSO) for authentication purposes, data was compromised by an individual logged onto the local network using a compromised username and password. What authentication control would have MOST effectively prevented this situation?

Suggested Answer: B

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) would have been the most effective control to prevent data compromise in this scenario:

Enhanced Security: MFA requires multiple authentication factors, such as a password (something you know) and a one-time code (something you have).

Mitigates Credential Theft: Even if a username and password are compromised, an attacker would still need the second factor to gain access.

SSO Integration: MFA can be seamlessly integrated with SSO to ensure robust identity verification.

Example: A user logs in with a password and then confirms their identity using an authenticator app.

Incorrect Options:

A . Challenge handshake: An outdated protocol for authentication, not as secure as MFA.

C . Token-based: Often used as part of MFA but alone does not mitigate password theft.

D . Single-factor: Only uses one method (e.g., a password), which is insufficient to protect against credential compromise.

Exact Extract from CCOA Official Review Manual, 1st Edition:

Refer to Chapter 4, Section 'Identity and Access Management,' Subsection 'Multi-Factor Authentication' - MFA is essential to prevent unauthorized access when credentials are compromised.


Get Premium CCOA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
21 comments · newest first
RA
Rana 9 months ago
Wait, they were using just a username and password? That's surprising!
ZO
Zona 9 months ago
Not sure if that's the only solution.
VI
Vincenza 10 months ago
Challenge handshake sounds old school but effective.
MA
Malcom 10 months ago
Totally agree, multi-factor is a must these days!
DA
Dante 11 months ago
Multi-factor would have definitely helped here.
JO
Jonelle 11 months ago
I feel like single-factor authentication wouldn't have helped here, but I'm not completely confident about the other options.
AL
Alyce 11 months ago
I practiced a similar question where multi-factor authentication was highlighted as a key control, so I'm leaning towards option B again.
MI
Mica 11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think challenge handshake protocols are more about securing the connection rather than preventing unauthorized access.
JO
Jospeh 12 months ago
I remember studying that multi-factor authentication is really effective against compromised credentials, so I think option B might be the right choice.
GI
Giuseppe 12 months ago
Ah, I see what the question is getting at now. With the cloud-hosted system and SSO, multi-factor authentication would have been the best way to add an extra layer of security and prevent the compromise, even if the credentials were stolen. I feel confident about this one.
AS
Ashton 12 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key here is that the data was compromised even though the user was logged in using single sign-on. So the most effective control would be something beyond just username and password, like a token-based or biometric authentication method.
LY
Lynda 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know multi-factor is a common security control, but I'm not sure if that's the most effective option here. Let me think this through a bit more.
TA
Tawna 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about authentication controls. I think the answer is multi-factor authentication, since that would have prevented the compromise even with the stolen credentials.
WI
Wilda 1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think token-based authentication could also have been effective in this situation.
JE
Jennifer 1 year ago
I agree with Cecilia, multi-factor authentication would have prevented this breach.
LO
Lorrine 1 year ago
Definitely multi-factor authentication. How else can you ensure that only authorized users can access the system?
NI
Niesha 9 months ago
↳ replying to Lorrine
Agreed! Multi-factor would have stopped that breach.
CO
Cory 10 months ago
↳ replying to Lorrine
Single-factor just isn't enough anymore.
LA
Laura 10 months ago
↳ replying to Lorrine
Absolutely, it adds that extra layer of security.
LA
Latanya 10 months ago
↳ replying to Lorrine
Multi-factor is the way to go!
CE
Cecilia 1 year ago
I think the answer is B) Multi-factor.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel