U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IIBA-AAC Exam - Topic 2 Question 42 Discussion

The team decides a story is too big to do in one iteration. The correct technique to apply at this point is:
C) Epic analysis
A) MoSCoW approach
B) Story decomposition
D) Story partitioning

IIBA-AAC Exam - Topic 2 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's IIBA-AAC exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 2
[All IIBA-AAC Questions]

The team decides a story is too big to do in one iteration. The correct technique to apply at this point is:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

https://www.agilealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/AgileExtension_V2-Member-Copy.pdf (47)

by Ilene at Oct 29, 2022, 06:45 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium IIBA-AAC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Mertie
7 months ago
MoSCoW approach isn't really the answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
8 months ago
Wait, are we sure about this? Seems a bit off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
8 months ago
Story partitioning sounds right to me!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristen
8 months ago
I think epic analysis could work too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
8 months ago
Definitely story decomposition! Makes it manageable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
8 months ago
I definitely remember the MoSCoW method, but it seems more about prioritization than breaking down stories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shay
8 months ago
I feel like story partitioning sounds familiar, but I can't recall if that's the right term for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about epic analysis being used for bigger stories too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
9 months ago
I think we talked about breaking down larger stories into smaller ones, so maybe it's story decomposition?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I know the going concern assumption is important, but I'm not 100% certain that's the right answer. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
9 months ago
I think I know how to approach this. Passing data between parallel loops sounds tricky, but a wire could potentially be used to communicate between them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
9 months ago
I'm feeling confident about this one. The proper handling of a stop payment does not include reversing the direct deposit, as that would be a separate action. The other steps listed are all part of the proper process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alica
1 year ago
Story decomposition is the way to go, like a hot knife through butter. Though I'd be careful not to cut myself on the crumbs.
upvoted 0 times
Terry
1 year ago
C) Epic analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
1 year ago
B) Story decomposition
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
A) MoSCoW approach
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Talia
1 year ago
MoSCoW? More like MeSoHungry! Story partitioning is the sensible solution, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Dick
1 year ago
D) Story partitioning
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothea
1 year ago
C) Epic analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
1 year ago
B) Story decomposition
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
1 year ago
A) MoSCoW approach
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
1 year ago
Epic analysis? Really? That's like trying to split the atom with a spoon. Story decomposition is the clear winner.
upvoted 0 times
Melodie
1 year ago
Let's break down the story into smaller tasks for better manageability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
1 year ago
Definitely, epic analysis seems too complex for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
1 year ago
I agree, story decomposition is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
1 year ago
D) Story partitioning
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
1 year ago
C) Epic analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
Latosha
1 year ago
B) Story decomposition
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
1 year ago
A) MoSCoW approach
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rocco
1 year ago
Hmm, story partitioning sounds like the logical choice here. Gotta split that story up, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Tanesha
12 months ago
D) Story partitioning
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
1 year ago
C) Epic analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
1 year ago
B) Story decomposition
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
1 year ago
A) MoSCoW approach
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
1 year ago
D) Story partitioning
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 year ago
C) Epic analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
1 year ago
B) Story decomposition
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
1 year ago
A) MoSCoW approach
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alline
1 year ago
Story decomposition is the way to go! Break that big story into smaller, more manageable pieces.
upvoted 0 times
Ernest
1 year ago
D) Story partitioning
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
1 year ago
C) Epic analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
1 year ago
B) Story decomposition
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
1 year ago
A) MoSCoW approach
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Starr
1 year ago
I prefer D) Story partitioning. It allows us to divide the story into smaller parts that can be completed in iterations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
1 year ago
I agree with Della. Story decomposition helps break down big stories into smaller, manageable ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
1 year ago
I think the correct technique is B) Story decomposition.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel