MENU
An atomic requirement:
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium ECBA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
A requirement can be of benefit to a stakeholder and still not be a desirable part of a solution. A requirement that does not deliver benefit to a stakeholder is a strong candidate for elimination. When requirements do not align, either the future state must be re-evaluated and the solution scope changed, or the requirement removed from the solution scope.
41 comments · newest first
NI
Nickole
11 months ago
D aligns with stakeholder needs, no doubt about it!
KA
Karan
11 months ago
Wait, can a requirement really be independent? Seems tricky.
ED
Edelmira
12 months ago
C is super important for clarity.
GL
Glennis
12 months ago
Totally agree, B is key too—no fluff!
CA
Carol
1 year ago
A requirement should definitely be independent!
JO
Joanne
1 year ago
I believe aligning with stakeholder needs is essential, but I wonder if that makes it atomic or just a good requirement overall.
FR
Francisca
1 year ago
I feel like common terminology is crucial for understanding, but I can't recall if that was specifically mentioned as part of atomic requirements.
AN
Annice
1 year ago
I remember a practice question that emphasized the need for clarity and avoiding unnecessary content. Maybe that's option B?
CA
Carissa
1 year ago
I think an atomic requirement should be independent, but I'm not sure if that's the only important aspect.
DE
Demetra
1 year ago
Whoa, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally confident I know the difference between all these characteristics. I'll try to eliminate the options that seem less relevant and then make an educated guess.
TO
Tony
1 year ago
Okay, let's see. An atomic requirement should be independent, concise, use common language, and align with stakeholder needs. I think I've got a good handle on this, so I'll select the option that covers all those points.
RO
Rosendo
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The options seem similar, and I want to make sure I understand the differences between them. Maybe I'll jot down some notes to help me think it through.
FA
Fairy
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the characteristics of an atomic requirement. I'll review each option carefully and select the one that best matches the definition.
TH
Theresia
1 year ago
I feel pretty good about this question. The key is to identify the option that best captures the essential qualities of an atomic requirement. I'll carefully read through each choice and select the one that seems most accurate.
LE
Lenita
1 year ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question about VM-Series firewall deployment modes in NSX-T. I'll need to review the different options and think through which three are supported.
CH
Cheryll
1 year ago
I feel confident about A being correct because the OpenTracing reliance was highlighted in our last revision session.
KA
Kathrine
1 year ago
I want to say it's "policy" based on my notes, but I could see it being "procedure" too, just like those scenarios we discussed.
ES
Estrella
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully to make sure I select the right options.
ST
Stefania
1 year ago
Atomic, huh? I'm picturing little requirement atoms flying around, colliding and forming larger requirements. Somebody call the requirement particle accelerator!
SO
Sophia
1 year ago
A) is a bit too broad, don't you think? An atomic requirement needs to be self-contained, not dependent on other things.
LU
Lucille
1 year ago
C) uses common terminology understood by the audience.
EL
Elly
1 year ago
B) contains no extraneous or unnecessary content.
FR
Frank
1 year ago
C) uses common terminology understood by the audience.
MA
Margarett
1 year ago
B) contains no extraneous or unnecessary content.
DI
Dierdre
1 year ago
A) is understood independently of other requirements or designs.
ME
Melissa
1 year ago
A) is understood independently of other requirements or designs.
MA
Maryann
2 years ago
Hmm, C) is an interesting one. Using common terminology is key for clear communication, especially with non-technical stakeholders.
RE
Rene
1 year ago
Definitely, it's important to speak the same language to avoid any misunderstandings.
SH
Shantell
1 year ago
I agree, it helps avoid confusion and ensures that the requirements are clearly understood by all parties involved.
NA
Natalya
1 year ago
Yes, using common terminology is crucial for ensuring everyone is on the same page.
EL
Eleni
2 years ago
I'd go with D). After all, what's the point of a requirement if it doesn't align with stakeholder needs? Gotta keep them happy!
IS
Isabella
1 year ago
That's true, each requirement should stand on its own to avoid confusion.
AL
Aleisha
1 year ago
A) is understood independently of other requirements or designs.
MI
Micah
2 years ago
Exactly! It's crucial to ensure the requirements meet the stakeholders' needs.
BR
Brandon
2 years ago
D) aligns with the identified needs of the stakeholders.
AS
Ashton
2 years ago
B) seems like the most accurate description of an atomic requirement. It's concise and to the point, with no unnecessary fluff.
CA
Carma
2 years ago
B) seems like the most accurate description of an atomic requirement. It's concise and to the point, with no unnecessary fluff.
JO
Joaquin
2 years ago
A) is understood independently of other requirements or designs.
TY
Ty
2 years ago
I believe it also needs to align with the identified needs of the stakeholders.
LA
Lavera
2 years ago
I agree with Tori, it should contain no extraneous or unnecessary content.
TO
Tori
2 years ago
I think an atomic requirement is understood independently of other requirements or designs.