Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 5 Question 88 Discussion

A business analyst (BA) is given an additional requirement near the end of the development phase that needs to be incorporated into the system as part of the same release. In this situation, the first activity the BA performs to understand the effect of the proposed change is to:
D) Consult with the technical team for technical feasibility.
A) Check with the project manager for timeline and budget metrics.
B) Determine whether stakeholders are available for further elicitation.
C) Determine whether the additional requirement is traceable to a need.

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 5 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CCBA exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 5
[All CCBA Questions]

A business analyst (BA) is given an additional requirement near the end of the development phase that needs to be incorporated into the system as part of the same release. In this situation, the first activity the BA performs to understand the effect of the proposed change is to:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Carlton at May 17, 2024, 01:05 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
King
8 months ago
Not sure if A is the best first step, feels off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noelia
8 months ago
I think consulting the tech team is crucial too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
9 months ago
Wait, shouldn't they check if the requirement is needed first?
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
9 months ago
Totally agree, option A makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
9 months ago
Gotta check the timeline first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
9 months ago
Consulting with the technical team sounds like a good idea, but I wonder if we should prioritize understanding the impact on the project first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
10 months ago
I remember a practice question where we had to assess the traceability of requirements. So, maybe determining if the additional requirement is traceable to a need is the right move?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like determining if the stakeholders are available for further elicitation could be important too. We need their input, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
10 months ago
I think the first step should be to check with the project manager about the timeline and budget. That seems crucial before making any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
10 months ago
Easy peasy! I'd go straight to the technical team. They'll be able to tell me if this change is doable or not. Once I know that, I can figure out the timeline and budget impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. I think I'd want to talk to the stakeholders and make sure this new requirement is actually needed. Don't want to waste time on something that doesn't add value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Penney
10 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'd want to start by checking the timeline and budget to see if we can even fit this in. Gotta make sure it's feasible first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
10 months ago
Okay, I've got a plan. First, I'd look at whether this new requirement is actually tied to a real business need. That's key. Then I'd consult the technical team to see if it's even possible to implement in the timeframe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
10 months ago
The end date being greater than the start date makes sense as a valid check during import. I'll make sure to double-check that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
10 months ago
I'm leaning towards constructive discharge. Even though Tom isn't directly firing Mary, his actions are creating a situation that forces her to leave the job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
10 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the key details before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
James
10 months ago
This seems straightforward - I'd go with option A to set up a low-priority rule to block all egress and a high-priority rule to allow only the necessary ports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
10 months ago
This is straightforward. I know the right answer involves using a proxy server and restricting external connections. Time to mark those down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
1 year ago
A is a good start, but I'd say B is the more critical first step. Can't get stakeholder buy-in without technical feasibility.
upvoted 0 times
Dorethea
1 year ago
Yes, that's important too. It's all about balancing the different aspects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
1 year ago
But don't we also need to make sure the requirement is traceable to a need?
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaiah
1 year ago
I agree, technical feasibility is key before getting stakeholder buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
1 year ago
I think B is the more critical first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lourdes
1 year ago
Haha, D is definitely not the answer. The project manager will just tell you 'no' and send you on your way!
upvoted 0 times
Jean
1 year ago
C) determine whether the additional requirement is traceable to a need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
1 year ago
B) consult with the technical team for technical feasibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
1 year ago
A) determine whether stakeholders are available for further elicitation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherelle
1 year ago
C seems like the logical first step to me. Tracing the requirement back to a need will help determine its importance and priority.
upvoted 0 times
Regenia
1 year ago
User 3: It also ensures that the change aligns with the overall project goals and objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brunilda
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, it helps prioritize and assess the importance of the additional requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, tracing the requirement back to a need is crucial to understand its impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carylon
1 year ago
I think B is the right answer. Consulting the technical team is key to understanding the feasibility and impact of the change.
upvoted 0 times
Laila
1 year ago
It's important to consider the technical aspects before proceeding with the change to ensure it can be implemented smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
1 year ago
Yes, the technical team can provide valuable insights on the feasibility of incorporating the additional requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
1 year ago
I agree, consulting with the technical team is crucial to assess the impact of the change.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
1 year ago
But shouldn't we also consult with the technical team to see if it's technically feasible?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
1 year ago
I agree with Eric. It's important to ensure the requirement is necessary before moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
1 year ago
I think the first thing to do is to check if the requirement is traceable to a need.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel