Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 5 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CCBA exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 5
[All CCBA Questions]

A business analyst (BA) has been tasked with examining and analyzing the relationship between a set of requirements by verifying that they are unambiguous. What will the BA be looking for?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Lili
4 months ago
I'm surprised this isn't more straightforward; requirements can get so messy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
4 months ago
Definitely! Understanding the relationships holistically is super important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure all relationships need to be described the same way?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
4 months ago
Totally agree! Clarity is key in requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
5 months ago
I think the BA needs to ensure there are no conflicting relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
5 months ago
I believe the BA should look for how the relationships help in understanding the requirements as a whole, so option D makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the types of relationships. I feel like option C could be relevant, but I’m not certain if it’s the main focus here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
5 months ago
I remember practicing a question about standardizing descriptions, which makes me lean towards option B. It seems important for clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
5 months ago
I think the BA needs to ensure that the relationships are clear and not conflicting, so maybe option A? But I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I could see the BA looking for a few different things - making sure the relationships are consistent, that they're necessary for understanding the requirements, and that they're not conflicting. I'm leaning towards option D, but I'm not 100% sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is that the BA is verifying the requirements are unambiguous, so they'll want to make sure the relationships are clearly defined and the type of relationship is specified. I'm going with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
5 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I think the BA will be looking for option C - that there is a genuine relationship and the type of relationship is described.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by this one. I'm not sure if the BA would be looking for relationships between different and conflicting elements, or just that the relationships are described consistently. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
6 months ago
Option C, the validation rule, seems like a good choice to me. That way, the rep can't close the opportunity without a renewal, so they have to take care of it. Seems like a simple and effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'm debating between Proxy ARP and Gratuitous ARPs. I'll have to think it through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Long
6 months ago
I'm not too familiar with these types of marketing metrics, but I'll try to reason through the choices logically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
2 years ago
That makes sense. If there are conflicting or unnecessary relationships, it could lead to misunderstandings.
upvoted 0 times
...
German
2 years ago
I believe the BA will also be checking for genuine relationships and ensuring they are necessary for understanding the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mariann
2 years ago
Yes, I agree. It's important that all relationships are described in the same way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
2 years ago
I think the BA will be looking for consistent descriptions of relationships.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel