Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 5 Question 73 Discussion

A business analyst (BA) is defining a stakeholder approval approach for the requirement deliverables. The project involves implementing new government regulatory requirements with significant risk to the organization in case of non-compliance. According to the BABOK Guide, what will the BA need to do?
A) Use a rigorous approval process of detailed specifications.
B) Ensure the document is completed and signed off.
C) Use an informal approval process to speed up delivery.
D) Ensure high-level user stories are completed and accepted.

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 5 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CCBA exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 5
[All CCBA Questions]

A business analyst (BA) is defining a stakeholder approval approach for the requirement deliverables. The project involves implementing new government regulatory requirements with significant risk to the organization in case of non-compliance. According to the BABOK Guide, what will the BA need to do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Requirements traceability is documented and maintained in accordance with the methods identified by the business analysis approach. Requirements management tools can provide significant benefits when there is a need to trace a large number of requirements that may be deemed unmanageable with manual approaches.


by Mireya at Aug 10, 2023, 03:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Albina
10 months ago
High-level user stories might not cut it for this project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
10 months ago
Wait, an informal process? That sounds risky...
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
10 months ago
B seems like the safest bet, gotta get that sign-off!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorriane
11 months ago
Totally agree, we can't afford to skip details here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
11 months ago
A rigorous approval process is a must for compliance!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
11 months ago
I recall that high-level user stories are important, but for regulatory requirements, I think we need more detail. D might not be sufficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
11 months ago
I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like using an informal process would be risky. C doesn't seem like a good fit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zana
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think ensuring the document is signed off is crucial too. B could be a strong contender.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
12 months ago
I remember studying the importance of a rigorous approval process, especially when compliance is at stake. It seems like A might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
12 months ago
I'm confident I can solve this one. The key is to use the correct DateTime formatting function and string.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
12 months ago
Okay, let's see. The question is asking for the minimum permissions, so I'm guessing it's not going to be the full "dbowner" or "sysowner" options. I'll probably go with C, since that seems to cover the basic read and write access needed for day-to-day tasks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
12 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. Testing is a key part of the quality assurance process, but QA encompasses a wider range of activities beyond just testing. I think option A is the best answer, but I'll make sure to double-check my reasoning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
1 year ago
Looks like C is the answer, unless you want the government knocking on your door. Not a risk I'd be willing to take.
upvoted 0 times
Malcom
1 year ago
User 4: I wouldn't want to risk non-compliance, better safe than sorry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
1 year ago
User 3: It's crucial to have a rigorous approval process for detailed specifications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, we can't afford any mistakes with those government regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elina
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, C seems like the safest option in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Meaghan
1 year ago
Option C, hands down. Who wants to risk non-compliance just to save some time? Not this guy!
upvoted 0 times
Lavonne
1 year ago
It's better to be thorough and make sure everything is approved properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
1 year ago
Definitely, we can't afford to take any risks with government regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
1 year ago
I agree, option C is the safest choice in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
1 year ago
I agree, C is the way to go. Detailed specifications need to be thoroughly reviewed and approved to mitigate the regulatory risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margret
1 year ago
Definitely go with C. Speeding up delivery through an informal approval process is not worth the risk of non-compliance.
upvoted 0 times
Merlyn
1 year ago
User 3: I think D could also work, as long as the document is completed and signed off properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
1 year ago
User 2: Yes, it's important to make sure everything is thoroughly reviewed, especially with high risk projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, C is the best option to ensure detailed specifications are rigorously approved.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristofer
1 year ago
Option C seems like the right choice here. With significant regulatory risk, a rigorous approval process for detailed specifications is crucial to ensure compliance.
upvoted 0 times
Arlyne
1 year ago
Jaleesa: It's better to be safe than sorry, especially when it comes to compliance with government regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
1 year ago
User 3: Absolutely, we need to dot all our i's and cross all our t's to avoid any potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaleesa
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, we can't afford any mistakes when it comes to government regulations. A rigorous approval process is necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
1 year ago
User 1: Option C is definitely the way to go. We need to make sure everything is thoroughly reviewed and approved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
1 year ago
User 4: Definitely, we can't afford any mistakes with these new regulations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
1 year ago
User 3: It's important to make sure all the details are thoroughly reviewed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
1 year ago
User 2: I agree, a rigorous approval process is necessary for compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
1 year ago
User 1: I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
1 year ago
I believe ensuring the document is completed and signed off is also important to show stakeholder approval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
1 year ago
I agree with Tenesha. With significant risk involved, detailed specifications are crucial for compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tenesha
1 year ago
I think the BA should use a rigorous approval process of detailed specifications.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel