IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 5 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CCBA exam

Question #: 73
Topic #: 5

[All CCBA Questions]

A business analyst (BA) is defining a stakeholder approval approach for the requirement deliverables. The project involves implementing new government regulatory requirements with significant risk to the organization in case of non-compliance. According to the BABOK Guide, what will the BA need to do?

AUse a rigorous approval process of detailed specifications.

BEnsure the document is completed and signed off.

CUse an informal approval process to speed up delivery.

DEnsure high-level user stories are completed and accepted.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

Requirements traceability is documented and maintained in accordance with the methods identified by the business analysis approach. Requirements management tools can provide significant benefits when there is a need to trace a large number of requirements that may be deemed unmanageable with manual approaches.

by Mireya at Aug 10, 2023, 03:42 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Albina

4 months ago

High-level user stories might not cut it for this project.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fletcher

4 months ago

Wait, an informal process? That sounds risky...

upvoted 0 times

...

Roxane

4 months ago

B seems like the safest bet, gotta get that sign-off!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorriane

5 months ago

Totally agree, we can't afford to skip details here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Veronika

5 months ago

A rigorous approval process is a must for compliance!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alishia

5 months ago

I recall that high-level user stories are important, but for regulatory requirements, I think we need more detail. D might not be sufficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daron

5 months ago

I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like using an informal process would be risky. C doesn't seem like a good fit here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zana

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think ensuring the document is signed off is crucial too. B could be a strong contender.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kathrine

6 months ago

I remember studying the importance of a rigorous approval process, especially when compliance is at stake. It seems like A might be the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodney

6 months ago

I'm confident I can solve this one. The key is to use the correct DateTime formatting function and string.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

6 months ago

Okay, let's see. The question is asking for the minimum permissions, so I'm guessing it's not going to be the full "dbowner" or "sysowner" options. I'll probably go with C, since that seems to cover the basic read and write access needed for day-to-day tasks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leah

6 months ago

I feel pretty confident about this one. Testing is a key part of the quality assurance process, but QA encompasses a wider range of activities beyond just testing. I think option A is the best answer, but I'll make sure to double-check my reasoning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Benedict

10 months ago

Looks like C is the answer, unless you want the government knocking on your door. Not a risk I'd be willing to take.

upvoted 0 times

Malcom

8 months ago

User 4: I wouldn't want to risk non-compliance, better safe than sorry.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenna

8 months ago

User 3: It's crucial to have a rigorous approval process for detailed specifications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Olive

9 months ago

User 2: Definitely, we can't afford any mistakes with those government regulations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elina

9 months ago

User 1: I agree, C seems like the safest option in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Meaghan

10 months ago

Option C, hands down. Who wants to risk non-compliance just to save some time? Not this guy!

upvoted 0 times

Lavonne

9 months ago

It's better to be thorough and make sure everything is approved properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

9 months ago

Definitely, we can't afford to take any risks with government regulations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tegan

9 months ago

I agree, option C is the safest choice in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chaya

10 months ago

I agree, C is the way to go. Detailed specifications need to be thoroughly reviewed and approved to mitigate the regulatory risks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margret

11 months ago

Definitely go with C. Speeding up delivery through an informal approval process is not worth the risk of non-compliance.

upvoted 0 times

Merlyn

9 months ago

User 3: I think D could also work, as long as the document is completed and signed off properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josphine

9 months ago

User 2: Yes, it's important to make sure everything is thoroughly reviewed, especially with high risk projects.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carolynn

10 months ago

User 1: I agree, C is the best option to ensure detailed specifications are rigorously approved.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristofer

11 months ago

Option C seems like the right choice here. With significant regulatory risk, a rigorous approval process for detailed specifications is crucial to ensure compliance.

upvoted 0 times