Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 5 Question 69 Discussion

Posted by Carlee on Apr 20, 2023 at 05:37 PM

A business analyst (BA) has completed multiple workshops involving a number of stakeholders, including the project manager; however, the elicitation results are inconsistent between the stakeholders. How should the variation in results be resolved?

Suggested Answer: A

Requirements traceability is documented and maintained in accordance with the methods identified by the business analysis approach. Requirements management tools can provide significant benefits when there is a need to trace a large number of requirements that may be deemed unmanageable with manual approaches.


Get Premium CCBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
33 comments · newest first
RE
Reynalda 12 months ago
I’m surprised there’s so much disagreement among us!
LI
Linette 1 year ago
Really? I thought the BA just gathers info, not decides what's correct.
WI
Winfred 1 year ago
Wait, why should the BA do it? Isn't that my job?
JE
Jesus 1 year ago
Totally agree, that's the best way to clarify things!
CH
Charlette 1 year ago
I think the BA should model the requirements in a review meeting.
KI
Kimberely 1 year ago
I feel like the BA should definitely be the one to model the requirements, but I'm not completely certain if that’s the best way to resolve the variations.
PH
Phuong 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about whether the project manager should be the one to decide on the requirements. I thought the BA's role was more about gathering and clarifying.
NI
Nidia 1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question where the BA facilitated a review meeting to clarify requirements. That might be the right approach here too.
VE
Veronika 1 year ago
I remember we discussed the importance of involving all stakeholders in resolving inconsistencies, but I'm not sure if the BA should model the requirements or if it should be the project manager.
ME
Merilyn 1 year ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. Phillip has two plans, and both have typical COB provisions, but no nonduplication clause. So the plans will coordinate to pay the full amount, but not exceed the total cost. I think the answer is B, $300.
KA
Kaitlyn 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not entirely sure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully. Maybe I should review my notes on currency management before answering.
FA
Farrah 2 years ago
The BA should definitely model the requirements in a review meeting. It's like a group therapy session for stakeholders - time to hash out those inconsistencies and find some common ground.
RU
Rutha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Farrah
A) Yes, a review meeting is a great way to address inconsistencies and ensure everyone is on the same page.
ED
Eden 1 year ago
↳ replying to Farrah
C) The project manager should model the elicited requirements in a review meeting.
EI
Eileen 2 years ago
↳ replying to Farrah
A) The BA should model the elicited requirements in a review meeting.
LI
Lisbeth 2 years ago
I'm just imagining the project manager standing up in the review meeting, pounding the table, and shouting 'Because I said so!' Not the most constructive approach, if you ask me.
AD
Adelina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lisbeth
C) The project manager should model the elicited requirements in a review meeting.
MA
Marsha 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lisbeth
B) The project manager should decide which requirement is relevant.
YE
Yesenia 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lisbeth
A) The BA should model the elicited requirements in a review meeting.
MO
Mozelle 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lisbeth
C) The project manager should model the elicited requirements in a review meeting.
CA
Carlene 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lisbeth
B) The project manager should decide which requirement is relevant.
CA
Carlee 1 year ago
↳ replying to Lisbeth
A) The BA should model the elicited requirements in a review meeting.
CR
Cristy 2 years ago
I'd avoid the BA just selecting the 'correct' requirements on their own. That's a recipe for missed requirements and unhappy stakeholders. Gotta get everyone in the same room to hash this out.
EL
Eloisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Cristy
C) The project manager should model the elicited requirements in a review meeting.
LA
Lavonna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Cristy
A) The BA should model the elicited requirements in a review meeting.
ST
Stephaine 2 years ago
I believe the project manager should also be involved in the review meeting to provide their input and make a decision.
MA
Margery 2 years ago
While the project manager's input is valuable, they shouldn't unilaterally decide which requirements are relevant. That could lead to bias and miss important stakeholder needs.
JO
Josefa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Margery
B) The project manager should decide which requirement is relevant.
TO
Toi 2 years ago
↳ replying to Margery
C) The project manager should model the elicited requirements in a review meeting.
TI
Timothy 2 years ago
↳ replying to Margery
A) The BA should model the elicited requirements in a review meeting.
LE
Lenna 2 years ago
The BA should model the elicited requirements in a review meeting to ensure all stakeholders' perspectives are captured and discussed. This is the best approach to resolve the inconsistencies.
PA
Patti 2 years ago
I agree with Felix, it's important to have a collaborative approach to resolve the variation in results.
FE
Felix 2 years ago
I think the BA should model the elicited requirements in a review meeting.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel