Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 4 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CCBA exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 4
[All CCBA Questions]

Kendra is the business analyst for her organization. She's working with the project manager and the project sponsor to discuss the current requirements. Kendra believes it's important for the project manager to first implement the requirements with the highest amount of risks. Is this a good idea?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

It's often best to implement the most risky requirements first in the project. If the risky requirements cause the project to fail, the organization will not suffer much loss, as it hasn't invested much time or money on the project.

Answer, A is incorrect. It's not the best idea to implement the lowest risk requirements first.

Answer, C is incorrect. Implementing the highest risk requirements last could cause all of the prior work to be worthless if the risky requirements fail.

Answer, D is incorrect. This choice is tempting, but the best reason is the financial consideration of the risky event in the project.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Yoko
4 months ago
Nah, better to start with low-risk to build confidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabine
4 months ago
I think it's smart to get the tough parts out of the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
4 months ago
Wait, isn't that a bit counterintuitive?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
4 months ago
Totally agree, tackle the risky stuff early!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
4 months ago
Implementing high-risk requirements first? Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Stacey
5 months ago
Yeah, getting the tough stuff out of the way makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
5 months ago
Implementing risky stuff early could lead to major setbacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
5 months ago
Surprised to see this approach suggested, seems counterintuitive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
5 months ago
Totally disagree, low-risk first is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
5 months ago
I think tackling high-risk requirements first can save time later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
5 months ago
I recall that getting the risky work done early can help with scheduling, but I wonder if it might backfire if those risks aren't managed well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharan
5 months ago
I think Kendra's approach could be risky, but if the project hasn't invested much yet, maybe it could work? I'm a bit torn on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
5 months ago
I remember discussing risk management in class, and I think we learned that addressing high-risk items early can be beneficial, but I'm not entirely sure if that's always the case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
6 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where it was emphasized to tackle lower-risk requirements first to build confidence and momentum. That makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
6 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about this question. There are a few settings mentioned that could potentially be relevant, but I'm not sure which two would be the best fit. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about how each one might impact the automatic posting of inventory-related documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
6 months ago
The footer? Really? I don't think that's where the marketer should focus. The body and envelope content seem like the obvious places to start optimizing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel