MENU
A business analyst (BA) is planning how to present a set of requirements for a project with financial constraints. Which requirements attribute should the BA assign to allow cost implications to be assessed?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CCBA Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
16 comments · newest first
TR
Tracey
11 months ago
Complexity makes sense, but I wonder if there are other factors too.
BE
Bernardo
12 months ago
Surprised that Source isn't the right choice!
TI
Timmy
12 months ago
Ownership? Not sure how that helps with costs.
TH
Thaddeus
1 year ago
I think Status is more relevant here.
CA
Carissa
1 year ago
Definitely goes with Complexity for cost assessment.
DA
Dahlia
1 year ago
Source seems less relevant for cost assessment, but I can't recall if we ever discussed it in that context during our study sessions.
BO
Bobbie
1 year ago
I’m leaning towards status as the attribute to assess cost implications, but I could be mixing it up with another topic we covered.
KA
Karl
1 year ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed ownership and how it might relate to costs, but I feel like that’s not the main focus here.
AL
Alona
1 year ago
I think the BA should focus on the complexity of the requirements, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right attribute for assessing cost implications.
JO
Johnetta
1 year ago
I think the key here is to focus on the financial constraints mentioned in the question. The requirement's status or ownership may not be as relevant for that.
AL
Albert
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Wouldn't the source of the requirement also be important for understanding the cost? I'm a bit torn on this one.
JO
Josephine
1 year ago
This seems straightforward - the cost implications would be best assessed by looking at the requirement's complexity.
LE
Lemuel
1 year ago
Ah, I see. The complexity of the requirement would give the best insight into the potential costs. That makes sense to me.
EL
Elsa
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to focus on exploring feasibility and future innovation opportunities with the technical team. That's the best way to get their buy-in.
VI
Virgilio
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about the syntax for the subquery. Should I use 'Job_Applications_c' or 'Job_Application_c'? I'll need to double-check the object documentation.
MI
Miles
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like it's testing our understanding of how to access and manipulate the output of an Ansible task. I think I'll start by carefully reading through the question and the options to make sure I understand what it's asking.