IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 1 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CCBA exam

Question #: 78
Topic #: 1

[All CCBA Questions]

A business analyst (BA) is planning how to present a set of requirements for a project with financial constraints. Which requirements attribute should the BA assign to allow cost implications to be assessed?

AStatus

BComplexity

COwnership

DSource

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Garry at Dec 14, 2023, 07:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Tracey

4 months ago

Complexity makes sense, but I wonder if there are other factors too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernardo

4 months ago

Surprised that Source isn't the right choice!

upvoted 0 times

...

Timmy

4 months ago

Ownership? Not sure how that helps with costs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thaddeus

5 months ago

I think Status is more relevant here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carissa

5 months ago

Definitely goes with Complexity for cost assessment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dahlia

5 months ago

Source seems less relevant for cost assessment, but I can't recall if we ever discussed it in that context during our study sessions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbie

5 months ago

I’m leaning towards status as the attribute to assess cost implications, but I could be mixing it up with another topic we covered.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karl

5 months ago

I remember a practice question where we discussed ownership and how it might relate to costs, but I feel like that’s not the main focus here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alona

5 months ago

I think the BA should focus on the complexity of the requirements, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right attribute for assessing cost implications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnetta

5 months ago

I think the key here is to focus on the financial constraints mentioned in the question. The requirement's status or ownership may not be as relevant for that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Albert

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. Wouldn't the source of the requirement also be important for understanding the cost? I'm a bit torn on this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josephine

5 months ago

This seems straightforward - the cost implications would be best assessed by looking at the requirement's complexity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

6 months ago

Ah, I see. The complexity of the requirement would give the best insight into the potential costs. That makes sense to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elsa

6 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to focus on exploring feasibility and future innovation opportunities with the technical team. That's the best way to get their buy-in.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgilio

6 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about the syntax for the subquery. Should I use 'Job_Applications_c' or 'Job_Application_c'? I'll need to double-check the object documentation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Miles

6 months ago

Hmm, this looks like it's testing our understanding of how to access and manipulate the output of an Ansible task. I think I'll start by carefully reading through the question and the options to make sure I understand what it's asking.

upvoted 0 times

...