U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 1 Question 78 Discussion

A business analyst (BA) is planning how to present a set of requirements for a project with financial constraints. Which requirements attribute should the BA assign to allow cost implications to be assessed?
B) Complexity
A) Status
C) Ownership
D) Source

IIBA CCBA Exam - Topic 1 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CCBA exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 1
[All CCBA Questions]

A business analyst (BA) is planning how to present a set of requirements for a project with financial constraints. Which requirements attribute should the BA assign to allow cost implications to be assessed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Garry at Dec 14, 2023, 07:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCBA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tracey
7 months ago
Complexity makes sense, but I wonder if there are other factors too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
7 months ago
Surprised that Source isn't the right choice!
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
7 months ago
Ownership? Not sure how that helps with costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
8 months ago
I think Status is more relevant here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
8 months ago
Definitely goes with Complexity for cost assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
8 months ago
Source seems less relevant for cost assessment, but I can't recall if we ever discussed it in that context during our study sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
8 months ago
I’m leaning towards status as the attribute to assess cost implications, but I could be mixing it up with another topic we covered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
8 months ago
I remember a practice question where we discussed ownership and how it might relate to costs, but I feel like that’s not the main focus here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
8 months ago
I think the BA should focus on the complexity of the requirements, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the right attribute for assessing cost implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
8 months ago
I think the key here is to focus on the financial constraints mentioned in the question. The requirement's status or ownership may not be as relevant for that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Wouldn't the source of the requirement also be important for understanding the cost? I'm a bit torn on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
8 months ago
This seems straightforward - the cost implications would be best assessed by looking at the requirement's complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
9 months ago
Ah, I see. The complexity of the requirement would give the best insight into the potential costs. That makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to focus on exploring feasibility and future innovation opportunities with the technical team. That's the best way to get their buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgilio
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about the syntax for the subquery. Should I use 'Job_Applications_c' or 'Job_Application_c'? I'll need to double-check the object documentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miles
9 months ago
Hmm, this looks like it's testing our understanding of how to access and manipulate the output of an Ansible task. I think I'll start by carefully reading through the question and the options to make sure I understand what it's asking.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel