Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 4 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBAP exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 4
[All CBAP Questions]

A large insurance company wants to buy a new claims processing system or upgrade one of its two existing system. Each year the claims department is given a $3.5 million budget to spend. Time is of the essence since there are tome regulatory charges that will be coming the following year that will require several features that currently neither one of the two claims System currently support.

There are eight stakeholders involved in this initiative. There are local to where the claim system are managed, while five are located across the country. The business analyst (BA) struggled to get all stakeholders to agree on the desired features but ultimately got agreement on ten identified key features for the new claims system. The BA was able to build a current state and future state process model which included all ten key features.

System a processes 75% of the company's claims. It is 5 years old and the claim processors love it because it is easy to use. However it must go offline for two hours each day. The code is very module so it does have flexibility to be modified. To upgrade system A to have all ten features it would cost $5 million. System A would be at capacity if it were to process all of the company's claims.

System B process 25% of the company's claims. It is an older mainframe system, but rarely goes offline. It could easily handle double the number of claims that system A processes. However it has a lot of legacy code and would cost $6 million to upgrade.

Both system have some of the tem desired key features. But neither system has all ten. The cost to buy a new system would be $7 million.

Below is the estimated cost for each feature in priority order.

If System A is unanimously selected to be the system for upgrade but the technical lead says that System A will have to be taken offline for 3 months, what kind of strategy should the project team develop while system A is offline?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Velda
4 months ago
$5 million for System A upgrade seems steep for just 10 features!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
4 months ago
Upgrading System B might be better in the long run, even if it's pricier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reed
4 months ago
Surprised they’d pick System A with that long of an outage!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
4 months ago
Definitely need a solid stakeholder strategy during that downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
5 months ago
System A is user-friendly but going offline for 3 months? That's a huge risk!
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
5 months ago
I wonder if a competitive strategy would even make sense in this context. It seems more about internal processes than competing with other companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
5 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to decide on a strategy for a system upgrade. I think a change strategy could be relevant since we need to manage the transition effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think a stakeholder strategy could help manage expectations while System A is down. We need to keep everyone informed, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Noble
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of having a solid strategy in place when a system goes offline. It seems like an organizational strategy might be the best fit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
5 months ago
Change management is going to be critical, especially with the potential for a lengthy system outage. We'll need to communicate proactively and have a plan to support the end-users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
5 months ago
The stakeholder management aspect is crucial here. Getting buy-in from all 8 stakeholders will be key to ensuring a successful implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
5 months ago
Upgrading System A seems like the most cost-effective solution, but the 3-month downtime is concerning. We'll need a solid plan to minimize disruption during that time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a complex scenario with a lot of factors to consider. I'll need to carefully review the details and weigh the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards a competitive strategy - exploring a new claims system might be worth the higher cost if it provides the best long-term solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
6 months ago
The wording of the options is tripping me up a bit. I'll re-read the question and definitions to make sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charisse
6 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different loop terminals and how they control the number of iterations.
upvoted 0 times
...
India
6 months ago
The key is to identify the one response that is not an advantage. I'm going to carefully review each option and think about which one doesn't fit.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel