Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 3 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBAP exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 3
[All CBAP Questions]

A large insurance company wants to buy a new claims processing system or upgrade one of its two existing system. Each year the claims department is given a $3.5 million budget to spend. Time is of the essence since there are tome regulatory charges that will be coming the following year that will require several features that currently neither one of the two claims System currently support.

There are eight stakeholders onvolved in this initiative. There are local to where the claim system are managed, while five are located across the country. The business analyst (BA) struggled to get all stakeholders to agree on the desired features but ultimately got agreement on ten identified key features for the new claims system. The BA was able to build a current state and future state process model which included all ten key features.

System a processes 75% of the company's claims. It is 5 years old and the claim processors love it because it is easy to use. However it must go offline for two hours each day. The code is very module so it does have flexibility to be modified. To upgrade system A to have all ten features it would cost $5 million. System A would be at capacity if it were to process all of the company's claims.

System B process 25% of the company's claims. It is an older mainframe system, but rarely goes offline. It could easily handle double the number of claims that system A processes. However it has a lot of legacy code and would cost $6 million to upgrade.

Both system have some of the tem desired key features. But neither system has all ten. The cost to buy a new system would be $7 million.

Below is the estimated cost for each feature in priority order.

If the budget for the initiative was firm, what is a feasible solution to make sure the project stays within budget?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Andra
4 months ago
Totally agree, System A is the way to go if we can keep costs down!
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
5 months ago
Buying a new system with only 8 features could save us money in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
5 months ago
Wait, why would we spend $6 million on System B when it’s so outdated?
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
5 months ago
Upgrading System A seems like the best option if it can handle the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
5 months ago
System A is user-friendly, but that downtime is a dealbreaker.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabrina
5 months ago
I keep thinking about the downtime with System A. Even though it’s cheaper to upgrade, that two-hour offline period might really hurt productivity. Maybe option D is worth considering?
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to balance budget constraints with stakeholder needs. I feel like option A could work if we focus on the most critical features first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
5 months ago
I remember discussing how important it is to prioritize features based on cost and impact. Maybe going with option B could be a good choice since System A is user-friendly and already processes most claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think upgrading System B might be risky due to its legacy code. It could lead to more issues down the line, even if it can handle more claims.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
6 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the possible causes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
6 months ago
I've got a good strategy for this. I'll eliminate the options that don't make sense, then choose the two that seem most likely based on my understanding of the policy management process.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel