U.S. Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 2 Question 29 Discussion

A business analyst (BA) finds that the solution service level agreement (SLA) cannot be met m one out of five identified scenarios. is there 4 a dependency on a requirement which is a part of a future release. How should the BA approach the solution limitation?
B) Increase the scope and include the dependent requirement
A) Assess the impact on the business operations
C) Modify the SLA
D) Change the business process

IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 2 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBAP exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 2
[All CBAP Questions]

A business analyst (BA) finds that the solution service level agreement (SLA) cannot be met m one out of five identified scenarios. is there 4 a dependency on a requirement which is a part of a future release. How should the BA approach the solution limitation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Willow at May 05, 2022, 04:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBAP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Reena
7 months ago
Increasing the scope might just complicate things more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashanda
7 months ago
Definitely assess the impact first before making any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
7 months ago
Wait, how can you change the SLA without the future requirement?
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
7 months ago
I think modifying the SLA is the best move here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
7 months ago
Sounds like a classic case of scope creep!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
8 months ago
Definitely assess the impact first before making any changes!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
8 months ago
Wait, can we really change the SLA without major consequences?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
8 months ago
But what if that impacts other areas?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
8 months ago
I think modifying the SLA is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
8 months ago
Sounds like a classic case of scope creep!
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
8 months ago
I feel like modifying the SLA could be a quick fix, but it might not address the underlying issue. I need to think this through more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think increasing the scope might complicate things. We should focus on what's feasible right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
8 months ago
I remember discussing how assessing the impact on business operations is crucial when SLAs can't be met. It seems like a logical first step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelaide
9 months ago
Changing the business process sounds like a big move. I wonder if we've practiced scenarios where that was the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking about the mechanism associated with hypervisors, but the answer choices don't seem to directly match that. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused. Is MAC filtering on the router or not broadcasting the SSID the right approach for this question?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
9 months ago
I remember this from our anatomy lectures - I'm pretty sure V1 and V2 are near the sternum, but V5 is definitely somewhere different.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
9 months ago
I feel like the SDK port should definitely not be 80, but I can't recall the exact combination that would work for the registration port.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel