Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 1 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBAP exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 1
[All CBAP Questions]

A business analyst (BA) finds conflicting requirements gathered from several stakeholders. Aside from interviews what additional activities can the BA use to safeguard against this happening?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Tammara at Aug 31, 2023, 08:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBAP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Veronika
4 months ago
Wait, mind mapping? That seems a bit unconventional for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
4 months ago
Definitely agree with item tracking, keeps everything organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
4 months ago
Not sure about brainstorming, it can get chaotic!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
5 months ago
I think user stories and scope modeling are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
5 months ago
Reviews and workshops are super effective for clarifying requirements!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
5 months ago
I think item tracking is more about managing tasks, but mind mapping could help visualize conflicting requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
5 months ago
I feel like brainstorming might not directly resolve conflicts, but it could generate more ideas to discuss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think user stories could help in understanding different perspectives, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
5 months ago
I remember we talked about how workshops can help clarify requirements by getting everyone on the same page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
5 months ago
Item tracking and mind mapping could be useful here. The BA could use these techniques to systematically document and visualize the different requirements, which might make it easier to identify overlaps, gaps, or contradictions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
5 months ago
Okay, I've got an idea. Brainstorming and estimation might be a good way for the BA to explore the different perspectives and try to find common ground. That could help uncover the root causes of the conflicting requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. User stories and scope modeling could be helpful, but I'm not sure if that directly addresses the issue of conflicting requirements. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
6 months ago
This is a tricky one. I think the key is to look for activities that can help the BA validate and reconcile the conflicting requirements from different stakeholders. Reviews and workshops seem like a good approach to get everyone on the same page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The options seem similar, so I'll need to really think through the details to make sure I select the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
6 months ago
Option C looks interesting - an HDP pool with a mix of NL-SAS and FMD drives could be a good balance of performance and cost. I'll need to double-check the latency specs on NL-SAS to make sure it meets the 1.5 ms target.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
6 months ago
I feel confident about this question. The key is identifying the term that describes a potential source of harm or danger. B. Hazard is the clear choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the total calculation. Should we subtract the supplier cost from the total production cost to find the benefit?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel