Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 1 Question 74 Discussion

A business analyst (BA) finds conflicting requirements gathered from several stakeholders. Aside from interviews what additional activities can the BA use to safeguard against this happening?
A) Reviews and workshops
B) User stories and scope modeling
C) Brainstorming and estimation
D) Item tracking and mind mapping

IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 1 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBAP exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 1
[All CBAP Questions]

A business analyst (BA) finds conflicting requirements gathered from several stakeholders. Aside from interviews what additional activities can the BA use to safeguard against this happening?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Veronika
10 months ago
Wait, mind mapping? That seems a bit unconventional for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
10 months ago
Definitely agree with item tracking, keeps everything organized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
10 months ago
Not sure about brainstorming, it can get chaotic!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
11 months ago
I think user stories and scope modeling are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
11 months ago
Reviews and workshops are super effective for clarifying requirements!
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
11 months ago
I think item tracking is more about managing tasks, but mind mapping could help visualize conflicting requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
11 months ago
I feel like brainstorming might not directly resolve conflicts, but it could generate more ideas to discuss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think user stories could help in understanding different perspectives, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
11 months ago
I remember we talked about how workshops can help clarify requirements by getting everyone on the same page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
11 months ago
Item tracking and mind mapping could be useful here. The BA could use these techniques to systematically document and visualize the different requirements, which might make it easier to identify overlaps, gaps, or contradictions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
11 months ago
Okay, I've got an idea. Brainstorming and estimation might be a good way for the BA to explore the different perspectives and try to find common ground. That could help uncover the root causes of the conflicting requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. User stories and scope modeling could be helpful, but I'm not sure if that directly addresses the issue of conflicting requirements. I'll have to think this through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephania
12 months ago
This is a tricky one. I think the key is to look for activities that can help the BA validate and reconcile the conflicting requirements from different stakeholders. Reviews and workshops seem like a good approach to get everyone on the same page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The options seem similar, so I'll need to really think through the details to make sure I select the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
12 months ago
Option C looks interesting - an HDP pool with a mix of NL-SAS and FMD drives could be a good balance of performance and cost. I'll need to double-check the latency specs on NL-SAS to make sure it meets the 1.5 ms target.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
12 months ago
I feel confident about this question. The key is identifying the term that describes a potential source of harm or danger. B. Hazard is the clear choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
12 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the total calculation. Should we subtract the supplier cost from the total production cost to find the benefit?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel