Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 1 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBAP exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 1
[All CBAP Questions]

A large insurance company wants to buy a new claims processing system or upgrade one of its two existing system. Each year the claims department is given a $3.5 million budget to spend. Time is of the essence since there are tome regulatory charges that will be coming the following year that will require several features that currently neither one of the two claims System currently support.

There are eight stakeholders involved in this initiative. There are local to where the claim system are managed, while five are located across the country. The business analyst (BA) struggled to get all stakeholders to agree on the desired features but ultimately got agreement on ten identified key features for the new claims system. The BA was able to build a current state and future state process model which included all ten key features.

System a processes 75% of the company's claims. It is 5 years old and the claim processors love it because it is easy to use. However it must go offline for two hours each day. The code is very module so it does have flexibility to be modified. To upgrade system A to have all ten features it would cost $5 million. System A would be at capacity if it were to process all of the company's claims.

System B process 25% of the company's claims. It is an older mainframe system, but rarely goes offline. It could easily handle double the number of claims that system A processes. However it has a lot of legacy code and would cost $6 million to upgrade.

Both system have some of the tem desired key features. But neither system has all ten. The cost to buy a new system would be $7 million.

Below is the estimated cost for each feature in priority order.

If System A is unanimously selected to be the system for upgrade but the technical lead says that System A will have to be taken offline for 3 months, what kind of strategy should the project team develop while system A is offline?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Rosalia
4 months ago
System B could handle more claims, but that legacy code is a nightmare.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jospeh
5 months ago
Upgrading System A makes sense, but they better have a backup plan!
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
5 months ago
Wait, how can they afford to be offline for that long? Sounds like a disaster waiting to happen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
5 months ago
Definitely need a solid strategy while it's down. Can't just leave everyone hanging.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
5 months ago
System A is user-friendly but going offline for 3 months? That's a huge risk!
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
5 months ago
I think the focus should be on an organizational strategy. We need to ensure that all departments are aligned and that there's a plan for handling claims during the downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adela
5 months ago
I feel like a change strategy could be crucial since we need to manage expectations while System A is down. But I wonder if we should also consider how it affects our competitive edge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
5 months ago
I'm a bit unsure about the best approach here. I think we might have covered something similar in our case studies, but I can't recall if it was more about organizational or change strategies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
6 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of stakeholder communication in class. If System A is offline for three months, we might need a strong stakeholder strategy to keep everyone informed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ceola
6 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'd focus on the key responsibilities of a Scrum Master - coaching, training, and facilitating understanding of Scrum.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
6 months ago
Okay, I think I see the relevant line, but I'm not 100% sure. I'll need to double-check the options to make sure I'm selecting the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
6 months ago
I thought about faster hard drives too, since they could reduce I/O wait times, but with such busy CPUs... maybe not?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel