A non-profit utility company has 900 employees, a majority of whom are hourly employees and must track their time using a paper based process. A few years ago, the Director of Human Resources purchased a software system to eliminate the current paper-based time reporting process. No requirements specific to the utility company were defined prior to the purchase. A team was formed to implement the software. During implementation process, the team discovered the software lacked functionality and was not robust enough to support the general ledger requirements The company stopped the effort and incurred a 1500.000 USD loss on the cost of the software.
This year, the Director of Finance requested that a team investigate the current paper-based time reporting process and recommend solutions. The Director of Finance feels that the Director of Human Resources must be involved as a critical stakeholder The Director of Human Resources is still bitter about the last effort because the process stopped.
During a design review meeting to discuss the future state, all stakeholders are in agreement except the Director of Human Resources. Who makes the final decision?
The governance approach defines the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders involved in the business analysis activities, including who has the authority to make decisions and approve deliverables. In this case, the Director of Human Resources is not the decision maker, but one of the stakeholders who needs to be consulted and informed. The final decision should be made by those who have the decision-making authority as per the governance approach, which may include the sponsor, the Director of Finance, or other senior managers.Reference:
CBAP / CCBA Certified Business Analysis Study Guide, 2nd Edition, Chapter 2: Business Analysis Planning and Monitoring, page 67
BABOK Guide, Version 3, Section 2.4: Governance, page 29
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!