Discuss IIBA CBAP Exam Topic 1 Question 118

A business analyst (BA) has completed the prioritization of requirements with various risk-averse stakeholder groups. Several requirements conflict with a regulatory requirement that, if not implemented, will result in a fine from a regulatory body.

What should the BA do?

AMeasure the value of the other requirements against the penalty of not meeting the regulatory requirement

BCompare the regulatory requirement to the recommended solution

CDetermine a means to work around the regulatory requirement

DInform the stakeholders that the regulatory requirement takes precedence over other requirements

Suggested Answer: D

The BA should inform the stakeholders that the regulatory requirement takes precedence over other requirements, because it is a mandatory constraint that must be satisfied by the solution. The BA should explain the rationale and implications of the regulatory requirement, and how it affects the other requirements and the solution scope. The BA should also seek to resolve any conflicts or issues that may arise from the stakeholders, and ensure that they understand and accept the priority of the regulatory requirement. Measuring the value of the other requirements against the penalty of not meeting the regulatory requirement, comparing the regulatory requirement to the recommended solution, or determining a means to work around the regulatory requirement are not the best options, because they do not address the root cause of the problem and may result in non-compliance, legal liability, or stakeholder dissatisfaction.Reference:

CBAP / CCBA Certified Business Analysis Study Guide, 2nd Edition, Chapter 3: Requirements Life Cycle Management, page 122

Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK) Guide, Version 3, Chapter 3: Requirements Life Cycle Management, section 3.5: Prioritize Requirements, page 62

Business Analysis Professional Resources, IIBA Resource Collection, Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK) Guide

CBAP / CCBA Certified Business Analysis Study Guide, 2nd Edition, Skillsoft Book, Chapter 3: Requirements Life Cycle Management, page 122

Get Premium CBAP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

30 comments · newest first

Dominque 7 months ago

A gives a balanced view. Weighing values is important.

Yuki 7 months ago

D is clear-cut. No point in risking fines.

Cristal 7 months ago

C is risky. Working around regulations can lead to bigger issues.

Lemuel 7 months ago

Option B seems reasonable. Understanding the solution is key.

Alisha 7 months ago

Wait, can we actually work around regulations? That sounds sketchy.

Annette 8 months ago

B seems like a good approach to find a balance.

Deja 8 months ago

I think C could work, but isn't that risky?

Earleen 8 months ago

A makes sense too, but can we really ignore the fines?

Louann 9 months ago

This question is a real regulatory nightmare! I'd go with D and just get it over with.

Michell 9 months ago

D) Regulatory compliance is not something to mess with. Stakeholders may not like it, but they'll like the fine even less.

Leonora 9 months ago

D) Definitely the way to go. Regulatory requirements are non-negotiable, no matter how much the stakeholders pout.

Reed 9 months ago

A) Measure the value of the other requirements against the penalty of not meeting the regulatory requirement. Gotta weigh the pros and cons here.

Sina 9 months ago

D) Inform the stakeholders that the regulatory requirement takes precedence over other requirements. It's the safest option to avoid hefty fines.

Aleisha 9 months ago

Working around the regulatory requirement seems risky, so I would avoid option C. I think we should stick to the rules.

Paola 10 months ago

I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to prioritize compliance, and I think option B could be relevant here.

Willodean 10 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think measuring the value of other requirements against the penalty could help clarify the situation. Maybe option A?

Catarina 10 months ago

I remember discussing how regulatory requirements usually take precedence, so I think option D makes sense.

Blondell 10 months ago

Definitely option D. The regulatory requirement is non-negotiable, so we have to inform the stakeholders that it takes precedence over everything else.

Aja 10 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure. Measuring the value of the other requirements against the penalty seems like a good approach to me. I'd lean towards option A.

Martin 10 months ago

D is the only option. Regulations come first!

Albina 11 months ago

I agree, but A could work too. We need to measure risks.

Elliot 11 months ago

I think option D is the best. Regulations must come first.

Gerri 11 months ago

I think comparing the regulatory requirement to the recommended solution, as in option B, could be a good way to see if there's any room for compromise. But option D is probably the safest bet.

Kenneth 11 months ago

I'm a bit confused here. Shouldn't we try to find a way to work around the regulatory requirement if possible? Option C seems worth exploring.

Harley 12 months ago

This seems like a straightforward regulatory compliance question. I'd go with option D - the regulatory requirement has to take priority.

Stefan 6 months ago

↳ replying to Harley

Yes, prioritizing compliance is crucial for the business.

Joesph 6 months ago

↳ replying to Harley

True, regulatory requirements should always come first.

Allene 6 months ago

↳ replying to Harley

Option D makes sense. Stakeholders need to understand that.

Noelia 7 months ago

↳ replying to Harley

I agree, option D is the best choice. Compliance is key.

Lindy 11 months ago

↳ replying to Harley

Definitely! No one wants fines.

IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 1 Question 118 Discussion