Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIBA CBAP Exam - Topic 1 Question 116 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIBA's CBAP exam
Question #: 116
Topic #: 1
[All CBAP Questions]

A business unit of a transnational manufacturer wants to implement a robust process for addressing integrity- critical equipment deterioration incidents. Timely and complete resolution of such incidents is vital for the business unit's continuous safe and profitable operation. Treating each incident involves many employees from different departments extensively collaborating and exchanging information. That information is spread across multiple systems having their access limited to particular user groups. With the current manual process, some incidents get forgotten and remain unresolved for years.

The project's Sponsor is an Equipment Integrity and Reliability Advisor, who moved into this position from another business unit. That business unit implemented a proprietary application to integrate the information and to assist in tracking and managing the incidents. Having a positive experience with the application, the Sponsor is suggesting to customize it and reuse in the new business unit.

The business unit's Enterprise Architect (EA), who is responsible for assessing solution options and presenting them to executive decision makers, has a few concerns with adopting the existing application. The application uses point-to-point interfaces with other data sources whereas the business unit's target architecture relies on a data warehouse-based integration. Moreover, the two business units use different legacy systems, as well as different front-end implementation technologies. Additionally, the existing application is monolingual, while the business unit needs user interfaces and some data to be presented in two languages. With all of this, it may be easier to build a new application from scratch than to customize the existing one. To understand which option is better, the EA asks a business analyst (BA) to define business requirements.

Through the elicitation process, the BA identifies the following requirement: "Particular incident-related activities require approval by authorized personnel before beginning them, as well as confirmation of acceptance of their completion."

What kind of asset should the BA provide to fully specify the approval requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A process diagram is a kind of asset that the BA should provide to fully specify the approval requirement. A process diagram is a visual representation of the sequence of activities and decisions involved in a business process or a system. It shows the inputs, outputs, roles, tasks, events, conditions, and flows that occur in each step of the process. A process diagram can help the BA specify the approval requirement by showing:

Which incident-related activities require approval and confirmation

Who are the authorized personnel for each activity

What are the criteria and triggers for approval and confirmation

What are the outcomes and exceptions of approval and confirmation

A process diagram can also help the EA compare the existing application and the new application by showing the similarities and differences in the process flows, data sources, and user interfaces.


[BABOK Guide v3], Section 10.28: Process Modeling, p. 410-412

CBAP / CCBA Certified Business Analysis Study Guide, 2nd Edition, Chapter 4: Requirements Elicitation and Collaboration, p. 161-163

Certified Business Analysis Professional (CBAP) Specialization, Course 2: Business Analysis: Requirements Elicitation and Analysis, Week 4: Requirements Analysis Techniques, Video: Process Modeling

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
King
3 months ago
Definitely need a business rule to define the approval criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
3 months ago
I think a RACI matrix makes more sense for roles and responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
3 months ago
A process diagram would clearly show the approval steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
4 months ago
Not sure if customizing the old app is worth it; sounds complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
4 months ago
Surprised they didn't consider a use case model first!
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
4 months ago
I lean towards a business rule because it directly defines the conditions for approvals, but I’m not entirely confident it’s the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
4 months ago
A use case model seems like it could work since it outlines interactions, but I feel like it might not focus specifically on the approval aspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
4 months ago
I think a RACI matrix could help clarify who is responsible for approvals, but I wonder if it captures the full detail needed for the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of process diagrams in visualizing workflows, but I'm not sure if that's enough for specifying approval requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
5 months ago
Based on the details provided, I believe a process diagram would be the best way to fully specify the approval requirement. It would allow the BA to map out the different steps and approval points in the incident resolution process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. The options seem to cover different types of requirements artifacts, but I'm not sure which one fits best for this approval requirement. Maybe I'll need to re-read the question and think it through step-by-step.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
5 months ago
The question is asking what kind of asset the BA should provide, so I'm thinking a business rule would be the most appropriate here. The approval requirement seems like it could be captured well in a business rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
5 months ago
Hmm, the approval requirement is pretty clear - it mentions activities that require approval by authorized personnel before and after completion. I think a RACI matrix would be the best way to specify that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
5 months ago
This seems like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the details to understand the approval requirement and how to best specify it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daisy
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe a use case model would be more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
7 months ago
A RACI matrix makes the most sense here. It'll clearly define the roles and responsibilities for the approval process.
upvoted 0 times
Dorthy
6 months ago
Yes, a RACI matrix is a great tool for ensuring accountability and clear communication in the approval process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
6 months ago
I agree, a RACI matrix would definitely help clarify who is responsible for approving and confirming incident-related activities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felton
7 months ago
I think the BA should provide a RACI matrix.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel