Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IFMA CFM Exam - Topic 9 Question 4 Discussion

Posted by Ling on Mar 09, 2025 at 09:16 AM

The building automation systems (BAS) experienced a power loss. The systems are now back online and are accessible by remote monitoring controls. From a remote login, you observe that the indoor air temperatures are warmer than the settings. What should you do?

Suggested Answer: C

When a Building Automation System (BAS) comes back online after a power loss, physical verification of HVAC equipment operation is essential to:

Confirm system restart success -- Some components may not fully reboot.

Check for mechanical failures -- Power loss could trigger equipment malfunctions.

Avoid incorrect system readings -- Remote monitoring may not reflect actual conditions.

Lowering temperature settings (Option A) is ineffective because it will not speed up cooling. Calling an onsite occupant (Option B) provides limited insight into the system's condition. While installing a generator (Option D) is a long-term solution, it does not address the immediate issue.


Get Premium CFM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
30 comments · newest first
LA
Lamonica 10 months ago
D is smart for long-term, but not the immediate fix we need.
MI
Milly 11 months ago
Wait, how did the power loss happen? That’s a bit concerning.
LE
Lemuel 11 months ago
C sounds like overkill, just check the temps remotely!
SE
Sena 11 months ago
Lowering the temp might just waste energy, not a fan of A.
HE
Hermila 11 months ago
I’d go with option B, always good to verify first.
TO
Tora 12 months ago
I vaguely recall something about recommending a generator for future outages, but it seems more like a long-term solution than a response to the current issue.
AN
Annice 12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where checking equipment was emphasized. Dispatching staff might be necessary to ensure everything is functioning properly.
AN
Annamae 12 months ago
I think calling an onsite occupant could help confirm if the temperatures are really off, but I'm not sure if that should be the first step.
RA
Raina 1 year ago
I remember we discussed how adjusting the temperature set points might not be the best immediate solution, especially if the system is still stabilizing after the power loss.
BE
Belen 1 year ago
I think the key here is to try to quickly restore normal operations and minimize any disruption to the occupants. Option D about installing a generator seems like a good long-term solution, but it doesn't really address the immediate issue at hand. I'd probably go with option A or B first.
DE
Denae 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by this question. Should we really be dispatching staff to physically check all the equipment, as option C says? That seems like it could be overkill, especially if we can monitor the system remotely. I'm not sure that's the most efficient solution.
JE
Jesusita 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if that's the best approach. Lowering the set points could potentially overcool the building, and we'd want to avoid that. Maybe it would be better to call an onsite occupant first to verify the actual temperatures, as option B recommends.
AU
Audry 1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about troubleshooting a building automation system after a power outage. I'd start by lowering the temperature set points to try to cool the building down faster, as option A suggests.
EM
Emerson 2 years ago
This reminds me of the time the power went out at my grandma's nursing home and the backup generator kicked in - talk about a loud surprise!
KR
Kris 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emerson
D) Recommend to the owner to install a generator to minimize the impact of future outages.
NG
Nguyet 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emerson
C) Dispatch staff to physically check all equipment for proper operations.
EA
Earlean 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emerson
B) Call an onsite occupant to verify the office space temperatures.
CA
Carmela 1 year ago
↳ replying to Emerson
A) Lower the temperature set points to cool down the building faster.
AN
Annita 2 years ago
D is an interesting long-term solution, but for this immediate situation, I think C is the best option to get things back on track.
WI
Willodean 2 years ago
A is definitely not the right call. Lowering the temperature set points could cause more issues if there's a problem with the equipment.
JO
Johana 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Verifying with an occupant first seems smart, but a hands-on inspection would give a more complete picture.
BE
Becky 2 years ago
B is the way to go. Verifying the temperatures with an onsite occupant is the quickest and most direct way to assess the situation.
DO
Dominga 2 years ago
I'd go with C. Sending someone to physically check the equipment is the best way to ensure everything is working properly after the power loss.
CA
Carmen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dominga
C) Dispatch staff to physically check all equipment for proper operations.
LA
Lavera 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dominga
B) Call an onsite occupant to verify the office space temperatures.
SE
Serina 1 year ago
↳ replying to Dominga
A) Lower the temperature set points to cool down the building faster.
GR
Gracia 2 years ago
I think recommending to the owner to install a generator to minimize the impact of future outages is a proactive solution.
CE
Celeste 2 years ago
I believe dispatching staff to physically check all equipment for proper operations is the best course of action.
SY
Sylvia 2 years ago
I disagree, calling an onsite occupant to verify the office space temperatures would be more effective.
LO
Lorrie 2 years ago
I think we should lower the temperature set points to cool down the building faster.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel