IBM Exam C1000-150 Topic 8 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-150 exam

Question #: 31
Topic #: 8

[All C1000-150 Questions]

What is the benefit of using the Rsyslog Sidecar?

AOffers easy adoption of audit logging and shifts the burden of transmitting the messages to the sidecar.

BMultiple deployments of audit logging controller policies.

CAbility to run a service and the rsyslog sidecar in the separate namespace as the fluentd instance.

DMore flexibility as to the format structure of the audit logs which can support JSON, XML, and YAML.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

The best data to check for installation and upgrade problems is Pod status. Pods are the smallest deployable units in a Kubernetes cluster and contain the necessary components to run an application. Examining the Pod status can help identify any issues that may be present with the installation or upgrade process. The other options are not related to this process.

by Kati at May 12, 2024, 11:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-150 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Suzi

1 months ago

Wow, you all are really overthinking this. The correct answer is clearly A. Shifting the burden of transmitting messages to the sidecar? Sounds like a vacation to me!

upvoted 0 times

Katina

19 hours ago

User 2: Yeah, that does sound like a vacation for the messages!

upvoted 0 times

...

Eric

20 days ago

User 1: I think the benefit of using the Rsyslog Sidecar is that it offers easy adoption of audit logging and shifts the burden of transmitting the messages to the sidecar.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alysa

1 months ago

Pfft, you're all missing the point. Option B is the way to go. Multiple deployments of audit logging controller policies? Sign me up! Redundancy is key, my friends.

upvoted 0 times

Marguerita

3 days ago

B) Multiple deployments of audit logging controller policies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

22 days ago

C) Ability to run a service and the rsyslog sidecar in the separate namespace as the fluentd instance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

24 days ago

A) Offers easy adoption of audit logging and shifts the burden of transmitting the messages to the sidecar.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlie

2 months ago

Hold on, guys. Option D is where it's at. The ability to support different log formats? That's the kind of versatility I'm looking for in my audit logging solution. Gotta keep those logs looking snazzy!

upvoted 0 times

Brittani

10 days ago

User 2: Definitely, it makes it easier to work with different tools and systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

1 months ago

User 1: I agree, having the flexibility to support different log formats is key.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kate

2 months ago

I think Option C is the winner here. Running the Rsyslog Sidecar in a separate namespace from the main application gives you that extra layer of isolation and flexibility. Who doesn't love that?

upvoted 0 times

Viola

8 days ago

That's a good point. Each option has its own benefits depending on the specific needs of the application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

12 days ago

True, but Option D offers more flexibility in the format structure of the audit logs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joseph

22 days ago

But don't you think Option A is also important? It shifts the burden of transmitting messages to the sidecar.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elli

1 months ago

I agree, Option C does provide that extra layer of isolation and flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

2 months ago

Option A is clearly the correct answer. The Rsyslog Sidecar makes it easy to adopt audit logging and handles the message transmission for you. No more worrying about that tedious task!

upvoted 0 times

...