New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM C1000-130 Exam - Topic 8 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-130 exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 8
[All C1000-130 Questions]

Which option should an administrator choose if they need to run Cloud Pak for Integration (CP4I) on AWS but do not want to have to manage the OpenShift layer themselves?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

When deploying IBM Cloud Pak for Integration (CP4I) v2021.2 on AWS, an administrator has multiple options for managing the OpenShift layer. However, if the goal is to avoid managing OpenShift manually, the best approach is to deploy CP4I onto AWS ROSA (Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS).

Why is AWS ROSA the Best Choice?

Managed OpenShift: ROSA is a fully managed OpenShift service, meaning AWS and Red Hat handle the deployment, updates, patching, and infrastructure maintenance of OpenShift.

Simplified Deployment: Administrators can directly deploy CP4I on ROSA without worrying about installing and maintaining OpenShift on AWS manually.

IBM Support: IBM Cloud Pak solutions, including CP4I, are certified to run on ROSA, ensuring compatibility and optimized performance.

Integration with AWS Services: ROSA allows seamless integration with AWS-native services like S3, RDS, and IAM for authentication and storage.

Why Not the Other Options?

B . Installer-provisioned Infrastructure on EC2 -- This requires manual setup of OpenShift on AWS EC2 instances, increasing operational overhead.

C . CP4I Quick Start on AWS -- IBM provides a Quick Start guide for deploying CP4I, but it assumes you are managing OpenShift yourself. This does not eliminate OpenShift management.

D . Terraform scripts from IBM's GitHub -- These scripts help automate provisioning but still require the administrator to manage OpenShift themselves.

Thus, for a fully managed OpenShift solution on AWS, AWS ROSA is the best option.

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration (CP4I) v2021.2 Administration Reference:

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Documentation

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration on AWS ROSA

Deploying Cloud Pak for Integration on AWS

Red Hat OpenShift Service on AWS (ROSA) Overview


by Trina at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-130 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Clemencia
4 days ago
Hmm, option D seems like a lot of work. I'd rather let AWS or the Quick Start handle the heavy lifting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
9 days ago
I'd go with option A. ROSA sounds like the way to go if you want AWS to handle the OpenShift management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
14 days ago
Option C looks like the easiest choice to get CP4I up and running on AWS without having to manage the OpenShift layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
19 days ago
I’m leaning towards option C, but I need to double-check if it really eliminates the need for managing OpenShift.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
24 days ago
I feel like I read something about Terraform scripts being a good way to automate things, but I'm not sure if that means less management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
29 days ago
I remember practicing a similar question about deploying on AWS, and I think the Quick Start option might be the easiest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
1 month ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the best choice for avoiding OpenShift management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
1 month ago
I'm leaning towards option C. The "Quick Start" approach sounds the most hands-off in terms of managing the OpenShift layer, which is what I'm trying to avoid. As long as the documentation is clear, that seems like the easiest path forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rochell
1 month ago
The Terraform scripts in option D could be a good choice, but I'm not as familiar with using Terraform. I'd have to spend some time reviewing the scripts to make sure I understand how to use them properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
2 months ago
Option A with ROSA seems like the best choice if I don't want to manage OpenShift. That way I can just focus on deploying CP4I without worrying about the underlying infrastructure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmett
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the differences between the options. Do I need to set up OpenShift myself in some cases, or will it be handled for me? I want to avoid having to manage the OpenShift layer if possible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
2 months ago
I think option C looks the most straightforward. The "CP4I Quick Start on AWS" sounds like it would handle a lot of the deployment complexity for me.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel