IBM C1000-130 Exam - Topic 5 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-130 exam

Question #: 63
Topic #: 5

[All C1000-130 Questions]

What type of storage is required by the API Connect Management subsystem?

ANFS

BRWX block storage

CRWO block storage

DGlusterFS

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Kenia at Jan 23, 2025, 02:30 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-130 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Audria

3 months ago

Wait, are you sure about NFS? Sounds too simple.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaitlyn

4 months ago

Totally agree, NFS is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Yolando

4 months ago

GlusterFS seems like an overkill for this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharan

4 months ago

I thought it was RWX block storage?

upvoted 0 times

...

Thurman

4 months ago

It's definitely NFS for API Connect!

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

4 months ago

I remember RWO block storage being important for some applications, but I’m not confident it applies here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ernestine

5 months ago

I’m leaning towards GlusterFS, but I can't recall the specifics. It might have been for a different component.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ceola

5 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I feel like RWX block storage was mentioned as a requirement for certain subsystems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannan

5 months ago

I think the API Connect Management subsystem needs NFS, but I'm not entirely sure. I remember something about shared storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jennifer

5 months ago

I'm a bit stumped on this one. The different storage options are a bit unfamiliar to me. I'll need to do some research to understand the differences and make an informed decision.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doug

5 months ago

NFS seems like a good option for this kind of use case. It's a common choice for shared storage in enterprise environments. I'll make sure to double-check the details, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolanda

5 months ago

Okay, let's see. The API Connect Management subsystem probably needs some kind of shared storage that can be accessed by multiple nodes. I'm thinking RWX block storage might be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

5 months ago

I'm not too sure about this one. The options seem a bit technical, but I'll try to break it down and see if I can figure it out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Muriel

5 months ago

Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the different storage options and which one would be best suited for the API Connect Management subsystem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

10 months ago

I bet the API Connect team is just messing with us. They're probably going to say we need to use a USB thumb drive and some duct tape.

upvoted 0 times

Dana

8 months ago

C) RWO block storage

upvoted 0 times

...

Erin

8 months ago

B) RWX block storage

upvoted 0 times

...

Shala

8 months ago

A) NFS

upvoted 0 times

...

Joana

10 months ago

RWO block storage? What is this, the Dark Ages? My grandma could set up a better storage solution than that.

upvoted 0 times

Adrianna

10 months ago

C) RWO block storage

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenny

10 months ago

B) RWX block storage

upvoted 0 times

...

Alverta

10 months ago

A) NFS

upvoted 0 times

...

Trinidad

11 months ago

Oh, come on! Everyone knows the answer is GlusterFS. It's the hipster choice for all the cool kids in the DevOps world.

upvoted 0 times

Lizbeth

9 months ago

I'm leaning towards GlusterFS as well for the storage solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgina

10 months ago

Yeah, GlusterFS seems to be popular among DevOps folks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

10 months ago

I've heard good things about GlusterFS, but I'm not sure if it's the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rueben

10 months ago

I think GlusterFS is the way to go for API Connect Management subsystem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ulysses

11 months ago

But wouldn't RWX block storage provide more flexibility for managing the data?

upvoted 0 times

...

My

11 months ago

I'm leaning towards RWX block storage. It provides the flexibility and redundancy required for a mission-critical system like API Connect.

upvoted 0 times

Kami

9 months ago

I've heard good things about GlusterFS, but RWX block storage is probably the safest choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dottie

10 months ago

NFS could also work, but RWX block storage seems like the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lisbeth

10 months ago

I think GlusterFS could also be a viable option for the API Connect Management subsystem.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissa

10 months ago

I agree, it offers the flexibility needed for API Connect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Blair

10 months ago

I agree, RWX block storage is definitely a good choice for API Connect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

11 months ago

I think RWX block storage is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chaya

11 months ago

NFS seems like the obvious choice for the API Connect Management subsystem. It's a reliable and scalable storage solution that's widely used in enterprise environments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corazon

11 months ago

I disagree, I believe it needs RWO block storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ulysses

11 months ago

I think the API Connect Management subsystem requires RWX block storage.

upvoted 0 times

...