Option C is the one that stands out to me. Having to click to identify the control selector in SAP is an extra step that doesn't seem necessary for Windows apps. I wonder if that's to account for some of the unique UI elements in SAP?
The differences between using the IBM RPA Recorder on SAP versus Windows applications are quite subtle, but I can see how they could trip up some developers. I'm leaning towards option D, since the vision driver requirement for SAP seems like a key distinction.
That's true. Also, SAP automation requires activating the vision driver in Recorder, whereas control can be directly identified for a Windows application.
Serina
2 days agoLinette
6 days agoTamar
12 days agoTammi
13 days agoTamar
14 days ago