New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM C1000-085 Exam - Topic 1 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-085 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 1
[All C1000-085 Questions]

When computing the row size for a table row, what overhead should be accounted for?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Stephane at May 06, 2022, 05:39 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-085 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jani
4 months ago
I agree with B, it covers all the bases!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
4 months ago
Wait, are we sure about D? That seems a bit high.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
4 months ago
No way, I think it's A. The overhead is less than that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
4 months ago
I thought it was C, the variable bytes for nullable columns matter.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
5 months ago
Definitely B, you need the null vector too!
upvoted 0 times
...
William
5 months ago
I thought the total overhead was 32 bytes, but I might be mixing it up with another question about row storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
5 months ago
I feel like option C sounds right, but I can't recall if the null vector has a fixed size or varies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
5 months ago
I think the overhead includes the ROWID and some other identifiers, but I'm not sure about the exact byte sizes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think the null vector is definitely part of the overhead if there are nullable columns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherly
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. There could be some nuance around what counts as part of the "delivery system" that I'm missing. I'll make sure to carefully review any relevant course materials before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
5 months ago
I'm going to cross out anything that sounds reasonable. The objective about estimating losses seems sketchy to me. That might be the false claim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The key is understanding how IRC Section 303 applies to the redemption of stock from a decedent's estate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully consider the options to avoid impacting the operational data store.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel