New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM C1000-010 Exam - Topic 8 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-010 exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 8
[All C1000-010 Questions]

A company wants to implement a business rules solution for warranty claims on their widgets. The customer requires that servers should not store any information about the context of clients between calls and must have a strict enforcement of objects, rules and constraints. The implementation must support complex operations and synchronous calls. Integration with other services must be platform independent. What implementation best fits the customers requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Franklyn at May 06, 2022, 08:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-010 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Galen
4 months ago
Totally agree, the strict rules need a solid implementation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
4 months ago
Wait, can a SOAP service really be platform independent?
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
4 months ago
JSON format is definitely more flexible than XML.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
4 months ago
I think using EJB might complicate things too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
5 months ago
Sounds like a custom SOAP web service is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
5 months ago
I recall that EJBs can maintain state, which doesn't align with the requirement of not storing client context. So, I think option A is definitely not the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
5 months ago
I feel like using JSON could be beneficial for integration, but I'm not sure if MDBs are the right choice here. Maybe option B is worth considering?
upvoted 0 times
...
Broderick
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question where we discussed the importance of platform independence. I think that might lean towards option D, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option C might be the best fit since it mentions SOAP, which could help with the strict enforcement of rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if manually restricting access or using a change set is the better approach. I'll need to carefully review the details and weigh the pros and cons of each option before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
5 months ago
This looks straightforward to me. The instances are still in the boot process, so they haven't been fully integrated into the Auto Scaling group yet. That's why they're not showing up in the aggregated metrics. I'm confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorathy
5 months ago
I keep mixing up elements like running processes and OS fingerprinting. I feel like listening ports could be relevant too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
5 months ago
I think option A makes sense since splitting the service capability could enhance reusability, but I'm not sure it's always the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel