Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP Exam CIPP/US Topic 8 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP/US exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 8
[All CIPP/US Questions]

A financial services company install "bossware" software on its employees' remote computers to monitor performance. The software logs screenshots, mouse movements, and keystrokes to determine whether an employee is being productive. The software can also enable the computer webcams to record video footage.

Which of the following would best support an employee claim for an intrusion upon seclusion tort?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

If the camera begins recording whenever the computer is turned on, that creates a strong argument that the employer is impinging upon the the employee's right to privacy outside of work hours and in a private setting.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Belen
4 days ago
This question seems straightforward - we need to identify which of the monitoring practices would best support an employee's claim for intrusion upon seclusion. I'll carefully review each option and think about the level of privacy invasion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
6 days ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is to recognize that "preteen" refers to ages 10-12, and "teen" refers to ages 13-19. So the answer should be based on the frequency counts for those age ranges.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
9 days ago
I remember we practiced calculating estate taxes with similar numbers, but I'm a bit unsure about the marital deduction impact here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
10 days ago
I'm pretty confident the answer is A. Firewalls are primarily focused on access control and blocking threats, not actively monitoring for anomalies. The NIDS, HIDS, and antivirus scanner are all designed to detect suspicious behavior, so the firewall is the only one that can't proactively detect anomalies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
13 days ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording here. Does "bind the partnership" mean the partnership has to be legally responsible for the transaction? If so, I'd guess that hiring employees or signing advertising contracts wouldn't require full partner approval, so I'll eliminate B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
14 days ago
Ah, I remember this from the lectures. The database needs to be in MOUNT state for operations that involve modifying the control files, like renaming or re-creating them. That's an important detail to remember for the exam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
17 days ago
This question seems straightforward, I'm pretty confident I can identify the correct statement about cost-volume-profit analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
1 years ago
I agree with Corazon. Using the company's webcam to spy on employees outside of work is definitely crossing the line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
1 years ago
I think option D would be the strongest. Recording video of personal activity is a clear invasion of privacy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
1 years ago
I wonder which option would be the best support for an intrusion upon seclusion tort claim.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
1 years ago
Yeah, it's definitely invasive. I feel like my privacy is being violated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dolores
1 years ago
I can't believe the company is monitoring us like this.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel