Free Preparation Discussions
MENU
IAPP CIPP/US Exam Questions
- Topic 1: Introduction to the U.S. Privacy Environment: This topic equips IAPP Information Privacy Professionals with foundational knowledge of the structure of U.S. law, focusing on its fragmented nature. It also explains enforcement mechanisms for privacy and security laws across the federal and state levels. Lastly, it highlights the U.S. perspective on managing information, offering a comprehensive framework for understanding privacy dynamics critical to professional practice.
- Topic 2: Limits on Private-Sector Collection and Use of Data: Information Privacy Professionals gain insights into sector-specific data protection frameworks, including the FTC's cross-sector guidelines and rules for healthcare, financial, and educational institutions. These regulations limit data collection and usage practices, emphasizing compliance and consumer protection.
- Topic 3: Government and Court Access to Private-Sector Information: This topic provides an overview of government and legal system access to private-sector data, addressing privacy challenges related to law enforcement, national security, and civil litigation. It equips Information Privacy Professionals to assess privacy risks and ensure compliance when responding to governmental or judicial data requests.
- Topic 4: Workplace Privacy: Workplace privacy is explored through its lifecycle before, during, and after employment, providing Information Privacy Professionals with the knowledge to manage employee data responsibly. The topic emphasizes balancing organizational needs with compliance obligations, ensuring privacy standards are upheld in employment settings.
- Topic 5: State Privacy Laws: This topic examines the interplay between federal and state authority in privacy regulation, highlighting diverse data privacy and security laws. Information Privacy Professionals also learn about state-specific data breach notification laws.
Free IAPP CIPP/US Exam Actual Questions
Note: Premium Questions for CIPP/US were last updated On Feb. 24, 2026 (see below)
Under GLB
Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), financial institutions are required to provide their customers with an annual privacy notice that explains how they collect, share, and protect customers' personal information. However, the GLBA Privacy Rule (16 CFR Part 313) was amended by the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) in 2015, which introduced an exception to this requirement.
According to the FAST Act, financial institutions are not required to provide annual privacy notices if they meet two conditions:
No changes have been made to their privacy policy or practices since the last notice was sent to customers.
The financial institution does not share customers' nonpublic personal information with nonaffiliated third parties in a way that triggers an opt-out requirement under GLBA.
Explanation of Options:
A . An insurance company that has no privacy department: This is irrelevant. The requirement to provide privacy notices depends on whether the organization falls under GLBA's definition of a 'financial institution' and their compliance with privacy practices, not on the presence of a privacy department.
B . An auction house that also acts as a financial institution: If the auction house qualifies as a financial institution under GLBA (e.g., if it arranges financing), it would still need to comply with GLBA privacy requirements, including issuing annual privacy notices unless it qualifies for the exception.
C . A credit union that has made changes to its privacy notice from last year: If any changes are made to the privacy policy, the credit union must issue an updated privacy notice to its customers.
D . A credit union that has not made changes to its privacy notice from last year: This is the correct answer. If the credit union has not made any changes to its privacy notice and meets the FAST Act exception criteria (outlined above), it is not required to issue an annual privacy notice.
Reference from CIPP/US Materials:
GLBA Privacy Rule (16 CFR Part 313): This rule outlines the requirements for financial institutions to provide privacy notices.
FAST Act (2015) Amendment to GLBA Privacy Rule: This amendment introduced exceptions to the annual notice requirement for institutions that meet specific criteria.
IAPP CIPP/US Certification Textbook: Details the conditions under which GLBA exceptions apply and describes how the FAST Act impacted annual privacy notice requirements.
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question;
Jane is a U.S. citizen and a senior software engineer at California-based Jones Labs, a major software supplier to the U.S. Department of Defense and other U.S. federal agencies Jane's manager, Patrick, is a French citizen who has been living in California for over a decade. Patrick has recently begun to suspect that Jane is an insider secretly transmitting trade secrets to foreign intelligence. Unbeknownst to Patrick, the FBI has already received a hint from anonymous whistleblower, and jointly with the National Secunty Agency is investigating Jane's possible implication in a sophisticated foreign espionage campaign
Ever since the pandemic. Jane has been working from home. To complete her daily tasks she uses her corporate laptop, which after each togin conspicuously provides notice that the equipment belongs to Jones Labs and may be monitored according to the enacted privacy policy and employment handbook Jane also has a corporate mobile phone that she uses strictly for business, the terms of which are defined in her employment contract and elaborated upon in her employee handbook. Both the privacy policy and the employee handbook are revised annually by a reputable California law firm specializing in privacy law. Jane also has a personal iPhone that she uses for private purposes only.
Jones Labs has its primary data center in San Francisco, which is managed internally by Jones Labs engineers The secondary data center, managed by Amazon AWS. is physically located in the UK for disaster recovery purposes. Jones Labs' mobile devices backup is managed by a mid-sized mobile delense company located in Denver, which physically stores the data in Canada to reduce costs. Jones Labs MS Office documents are securely stored in a Microsoft Office 365 data
When storing Jane's fingerprint for remote authentication. Jones Labs should consider legality issues under which of the following9
When storing biometric data, such as fingerprints, organizations in the U.S. must comply with state-specific biometric privacy laws if they operate in states that regulate biometric information. The most prominent of these laws is the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), but similar laws also exist or are developing in other states, such as Texas and Washington.
Key Considerations for Storing Biometric Data:
Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA): BIPA (740 ILCS 14) is a leading and highly influential state law regulating the collection, storage, and use of biometric information. It requires organizations to:
Obtain informed, written consent before collecting biometric data.
Establish a publicly available policy governing the retention and destruction of biometric data.
Use a reasonable standard of care to protect biometric data from unauthorized access or use.
Prohibit the sale or transfer of biometric data without consent.
California and Biometric Data: While California's California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) provide general protections for personal information, including biometric data, they do not have the specific consent and handling requirements that BIPA does. Nevertheless, California residents have rights related to access, deletion, and the sale of biometric information.
Explanation of Options:
A. The Privacy Rule of the HITECH Act: The HITECH Act applies to the protection of protected health information (PHI) under HIPAA. While the Privacy Rule regulates healthcare-related information, it does not apply to Jane's biometric data used for remote authentication unless it is tied to PHI. This scenario is unrelated to healthcare, so this answer is incorrect.
B. The California IoT Security Law (SB 327): California's IoT Security Law primarily focuses on ensuring security requirements for connected devices. It does not regulate the collection or storage of biometric information. This is not relevant to the question.
C. The applicable state law such as Illinois BIPA: This is correct. State biometric privacy laws, such as Illinois BIPA, explicitly govern the collection, storage, and use of biometric data like fingerprints. Organizations like Jones Labs must ensure compliance with such laws, including obtaining consent and properly securing and destroying biometric information.
D. The federal Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA): GINA prohibits discrimination based on genetic information in employment and health insurance. However, it does not regulate the storage of biometric data like fingerprints. This is not applicable to this scenario.
Best Practices for Compliance:
Jones Labs should:
Understand the applicable state biometric laws: If Jane resides in Illinois or other states with biometric laws, Jones Labs must comply with those specific legal requirements.
Obtain informed consent: Ensure that employees like Jane sign a written consent form before storing their fingerprints for authentication.
Secure biometric data: Use strong encryption and other security measures to protect the biometric information.
Define retention and destruction policies: Clearly establish how long biometric data will be stored and how it will be destroyed after its purpose is fulfilled.
Reference from CIPP/US Materials:
Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA): Sets the standard for biometric privacy regulations in the U.S.
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA): Protects personal information but does not specifically regulate biometric data like fingerprints with the same rigor as BIPA.
IAPP CIPP/US Certification Textbook: Discusses the emergence of state-specific biometric privacy laws and their applicability in different scenarios.
What was the original purpose of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act?
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next QUESTION:
Matt went into his son's bedroom one evening and found him stretched out on his bed typing on his laptop. ''Doing your network?'' Matt asked hopefully.
''No,'' the boy said. ''I'm filling out a survey.''
Matt looked over his son's shoulder at his computer screen. ''What kind of survey?'' ''It's asking Questions about my opinions.''
''Let me see,'' Matt said, and began reading the list of Questions that his son had already answered. ''It's asking your opinions about the government and citizenship. That's a little odd. You're only ten.''
Matt wondered how the web link to the survey had ended up in his son's email inbox. Thinking the message might have been sent to his son by mistake he opened it and read it. It had come from an entity called the Leadership Project, and the content and the graphics indicated that it was intended for children. As Matt read further he learned that kids who took the survey were automatically registered in a contest to win the first book in a series about famous leaders.
To Matt, this clearly seemed like a marketing ploy to solicit goods and services to children. He asked his son if he had been prompted to give information about himself in order to take the survey. His son told him he had been asked to give his name, address, telephone number, and date of birth, and to answer Questions about his favorite games and toys.
Matt was concerned. He doubted if it was legal for the marketer to collect information from his son in the way that it was. Then he noticed several other commercial emails from marketers advertising products for children in his son's inbox, and he decided it was time to report the incident to the proper authorities.
How does Matt come to the decision to report the marketer's activities?
Read this notice:
Our website uses cookies. Cookies allow us to identify the computer or device you're using to access the site, but they don't identify you personally. For instructions on setting your Web browser to refuse cookies, click here.
What type of legal choice does not notice provide?
The four types of legal choices mentioned in the question are:
Based on the description of the cookie notice in the question, the type of legal choice that the notice provides isimplied consent, as the website does not explicitly ask for the user's agreement, but rather assumes that the user accepts the use of cookies by using the site. The notice also provides a link for the user to opt out of cookies by setting their browser to refuse them.
- Select Question Types you want
- Set your Desired Pass Percentage
- Allocate Time (Hours : Minutes)
- Create Multiple Practice tests with Limited Questions
- Customer Support
Elvera
3 days agoMadalyn
12 days agoKatina
19 days agoJules
26 days agoCarey
1 month agoJohnna
1 month agoCarylon
2 months agoClaudia
2 months agoVan
2 months agoEulah
2 months agoShantell
3 months agoMaile
3 months agoAshlyn
3 months agoMose
3 months agoGeorgiann
4 months agoMarya
4 months agoCarey
4 months agoLeslie
4 months agoRikki
5 months agoReena
5 months agoJohana
5 months agoJade
5 months agoFranklyn
5 months agoTran
6 months agoPhil
6 months agoBarb
8 months agoErasmo
9 months agoCasie
10 months agoJohana
11 months agoMirta
1 year agoLonny
1 year agoDerick
1 year agoBettina
1 year agoDevorah
1 year agoStephania
1 year agoRosio
1 year agoDonte
1 year agoQuentin
1 year agoJacklyn
1 year agoMurray
1 year agoRodolfo
1 year agoCristal
1 year agoHerschel
1 year agoHyman
1 year agoFrancisca
1 year agoEllen
2 years agoNoe
2 years agoDeonna
2 years agoFranklyn
2 years agoGilberto
2 years agoCrista
2 years ago