MENU
Your organization is using the whole job ranking technique as part of its non-quantitative job evaluation. Which one of the following best describes the whole job ranking technique?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium PHR Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
Quid pro quo happens when the acceptance or decline of an unwanted sexual advance leads to a hiring, employment, or workplace decision.
Because Sammy refused the dinner date, Pat didn't hire Sammy.
Answer option A is incorrect. Covert is not a valid sexual harassment term.
Answer option C is incorrect. Contingent is not a valid sexual harassment term.
Answer option D is incorrect. A hostile work environment describes unwelcome sexual conduct that interferes with a person's ability to complete their work, intimidation, or an offensive work environment.
39 comments · newest first
JA
Jacqueline
10 months ago
I thought it was about categorizing jobs into levels, not ranking them!
MA
Marvel
11 months ago
I think it's more about overall job performance, not just importance.
GE
Gennie
11 months ago
Wait, is it really just about importance? Sounds too simple.
GE
Georgiann
11 months ago
Totally agree, it's about prioritizing roles!
ST
Stefania
11 months ago
Whole job ranking means ranking jobs by importance, right?
ME
Mertie
12 months ago
I vaguely recall that whole job ranking involves comparing jobs as a whole, but I can't remember if it specifically means ranking them from lowest to highest.
BL
Blythe
12 months ago
This question reminds me of a practice question where we had to categorize jobs. I feel like option A could be the right choice, but I need to double-check.
NU
Nu
12 months ago
I think whole job ranking is about ranking jobs based on their overall importance, but I might be mixing it up with something else.
CE
Ceola
1 year ago
I remember studying job evaluation methods, but I'm not entirely sure how the whole job ranking technique differs from other methods.
AB
Abel
1 year ago
I'm not totally sure about this one. The options don't seem to fully capture the essence of the whole job ranking technique. I'll have to make an educated guess here.
LE
Lettie
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The options don't seem to match the description of the whole job ranking technique that I'm familiar with. I'll have to think this through carefully.
BL
Blythe
1 year ago
This seems straightforward - the whole job ranking technique involves ranking jobs from lowest to highest importance, so I'll go with option A.
NI
Nickole
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The whole job ranking technique categorizes jobs into broad levels or categories, so option C looks like the best answer.
DA
Daisy
1 year ago
This looks like a straightforward networking question. I'm pretty confident I can figure this out.
LA
Lashanda
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on the options, it looks like I need to select "Toggle the radio button for Route from user/team to queue" to change the target of the routing rule. That seems like the most direct approach.
PH
Phyliss
1 year ago
Definitely going to eliminate A and D quickly. The key is focusing on the commission's core purpose around financial reporting integrity.
ER
Erasmo
1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The solution seems to be option B, where you can link the site to the process app through the admin console. I'll make a note of that in my exam prep.
KA
Katina
1 year ago
Okay, I think I understand the scenario. The key is to ensure VM1 can only access storage1 and not the other storage accounts. Let me double-check the steps.
WI
Wilford
1 year ago
I'd like to rank the job of the person who wrote these answer choices from lowest to highest importance. That might be more entertaining than this exam.
BE
Beatriz
1 year ago
D) New jobs are categorized into an existing hierarchy of jobs within the organization.
CA
Catherin
1 year ago
C) Jobs are categorized into broad categories or levels.
MI
Mitzie
1 year ago
A) Jobs are ranked from lowest to highest according to the importance that each job holds.
AL
Aleta
1 year ago
D) Categorizing new jobs into an existing hierarchy? That's like putting a square peg in a round hole. Not the best option here.
RI
Rikki
1 year ago
C) This one seems the most accurate to me. Categorizing jobs into broad levels is a common approach in job evaluation.
LO
Lonny
1 year ago
D) New jobs are categorized into an existing hierarchy of jobs within the organization.
DO
Doretha
1 year ago
C) Jobs are categorized into broad categories or levels.
ST
Stephen
1 year ago
B) Jobs are reviewed based on the entire performance of the organization in each category.
CA
Carma
1 year ago
A) Jobs are ranked from lowest to highest according to the importance that each job holds.
MA
Maryann
1 year ago
B) Hmm, reviewing the entire performance of the organization doesn't quite fit the description of 'job evaluation' in my opinion.
LE
Lemuel
1 year ago
C) Jobs are categorized into broad categories or levels.
DE
Dean
1 year ago
A) Jobs are ranked from lowest to highest according to the importance that each job holds.
MI
Mitsue
2 years ago
A) Seems logical, ranking jobs based on importance makes sense. I'll go with that.
MI
Minna
1 year ago
C) I think categorizing jobs into broad categories or levels is more efficient for job evaluation.
LU
Lucy
1 year ago
A) That could be a valid point, but I still believe ranking jobs based on importance is key.
CL
Clemencia
1 year ago
B) I think it's more about reviewing the overall performance of the organization in each category.
GE
Gene
1 year ago
A) Seems logical, ranking jobs based on importance makes sense. I'll go with that.
FR
Freeman
2 years ago
I believe jobs are ranked from lowest to highest according to the importance that each job holds.
ET
Ethan
2 years ago
I agree with Twanna. It helps in understanding the hierarchy of jobs within the organization.
TW
Twanna
2 years ago
I think the whole job ranking technique is about categorizing jobs into broad categories or levels.