Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HRCI PHR Exam - Topic 10 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for HRCI's PHR exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 10
[All PHR Questions]

Your organization will be using the factor comparison technique in their evaluations of job performance. You need to communicate what the factor comparison technique accomplishes as you're the HR Professional for your organization. Which of the following best describes the factor comparison technique?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Planning is the foundation for a manager to establish the goals of the organization. Answer option C is incorrect. The organization's mission statement communicates the direction, intent, and purpose of the organization. Answer option D is incorrect. Planning is to provide groundwork for the managers to achieve their goals, but for the organization to achieve its goals. Answer option A is incorrect. Planning, in project management, does provide direction to the project team to reach their goals, but in this context it's planning for the organization, not a project.


by Troy at Sep 18, 2024, 08:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PHR Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Gerry
4 months ago
Definitely a structured way to evaluate performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
5 months ago
Wait, does this really determine pay rates? Sounds complicated!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
5 months ago
Not sure if it’s the best method for all jobs though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
5 months ago
I think it helps clarify job worth, totally agree!
upvoted 0 times
...
Millie
5 months ago
Factor comparison ranks job factors and assigns monetary values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards option A, but I recall that the technique also involves assigning values, so I might be missing something important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shoshana
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like option D makes the most sense since it talks about determining a pay rate, which aligns with what we learned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberto
6 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar because it mentions assigning monetary values, but I'm not certain if it’s about bonuses or pay rates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
6 months ago
I remember studying the factor comparison technique, but I'm a bit unsure about whether it focuses more on bonuses or pay rates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
6 months ago
I'm a little unsure about the details of the factor comparison technique. I'll need to think through each option and see which one aligns best with my understanding of how it works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
6 months ago
Okay, I remember learning about factor comparison in class. I think it involves ranking the different factors of a job and assigning monetary values to them. Let me re-read the options to see which one captures that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
6 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a straightforward question about the factor comparison technique. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think about which one best describes what the technique accomplishes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
6 months ago
Ah, I've got this! The factor comparison technique is all about ranking the different compensable factors of a job and then assigning monetary values to each one. Option B seems to describe that process the most accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
6 months ago
I remember there was a similar question on our practice exam about security bindings. Could it be that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
11 months ago
Factor comparison technique? Sounds like a fancy way to play 'pin the tail on the job description'! But hey, at least it's not as confusing as trying to figure out the company's dress code policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
11 months ago
Ranking compensable factors, assigning monetary values, and determining job worth? Sounds like a job evaluation technique straight out of the HR textbook. I'm feeling pretty confident that option B is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Devon
9 months ago
Option B definitely seems like the best description of the factor comparison technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
10 months ago
Yes, option B includes ranking factors, assigning values, and determining job worth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Desmond
10 months ago
I think you're right, option B covers all the aspects of the factor comparison technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
10 months ago
I agree, option B seems to be the most comprehensive choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lizbeth
11 months ago
A bonus structure, you say? Well, that's one way to spice up the factor comparison technique. But I'm not sure that's the primary purpose here. I'd go with option D to keep it simple and focus on determining the pay rate.
upvoted 0 times
Erasmo
10 months ago
Yeah, a bonus structure might add complexity. Option D seems like the most straightforward approach for using the factor comparison technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yaeko
10 months ago
I agree, keeping it simple with just determining the pay rate makes sense. It's important to stay focused on the primary purpose.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
10 months ago
I think option D is the best choice. It focuses on determining the pay rate, which is the main goal of the factor comparison technique.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roslyn
11 months ago
Hmm, this seems to be a systematic way to determine the value of each job. I like how it takes into account performance, history, and the worth of each factor. Looks like option B is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Marisha
10 months ago
It's a thorough method that takes into consideration different aspects of job value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamar
11 months ago
Yes, it considers various factors to determine the worth of each job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
11 months ago
I agree, option B seems to be the most comprehensive approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emelda
12 months ago
Ah, a factor comparison technique! Sounds like a job evaluation method straight out of the HR playbook. I guess they want to make sure we're not comparing apples to oranges when it comes to compensation.
upvoted 0 times
Carma
11 months ago
D) Factor comparison is an evaluation technique that involves the ranking of each compensable factor of each job. A monetary value is assigned for each factor to determine its worth. Based on performance, historical information, and value this approach determines a pay rate for each job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
11 months ago
B) Factor comparison is an evaluation technique that involves the ranking of each compensable factor of each job. A monetary value is assigned for each factor to determine its worth. Based on performance, historical information, and value this approach determines the importance and value of each job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edwin
11 months ago
A) Factor comparison is an evaluation technique that involves the ranking of each compensable factor of each job.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
My
1 year ago
I believe the factor comparison technique helps in determining the pay rate for each job based on performance and historical information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 year ago
I agree with Melina. It also involves assigning a monetary value to each factor to determine its worth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melina
1 year ago
I think the factor comparison technique is about ranking compensable factors of each job.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel