Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE7-A07 Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A07 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 1
[All HPE7-A07 Questions]

A customer has recently deployed a wireless system using AP-535S to provide connectivity for their employees who are responsible tor uploading large video files for review. The customer wants to use features that provide throughput gains for large data uploads.

Which feature can be enabled to meet the requirement and simultaneously allow spatially separated clients access to the channel?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

USB dongles often require additional power, which may exceed the power delivery capabilities of Class 4 PoE switches. Aruba AP-615 and AP-635 are designed to work with USB dongles that require additional power for proper operation. Since the Cat 6A cable can support higher power levels, replacing the Class 4 PoE switches with Class 6 PoE switches, which can deliver higher power, should resolve the issue with the dongles not powering up.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lottie
2 months ago
I'm just going to go with whatever the person next to me picks. Wireless networking questions always make my head spin.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
3 months ago
D) UL MU-MIMO for sure! It's like having a superhighway for all those video files. I bet the customer will be uploading them at the speed of light with this feature.
upvoted 0 times
Clarence
1 months ago
D: UL-TXBF might also be worth looking into. It can help improve the signal quality and coverage for those large file uploads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
1 months ago
C: DL MU-MIMO could also be a good option to consider. It allows multiple clients to access the channel simultaneously, which could help with the spatially separated clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
1 months ago
B: I agree, UL MU-MIMO will really boost the throughput for those data uploads. The customer will be happy with the speed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brendan
2 months ago
A: UL MU-MIMO is definitely the way to go for those large video uploads. It's like having a dedicated lane just for them!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Frederica
3 months ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards C) DL MU-MIMO, but I wonder if that's really the best option for large data uploads. Maybe I should re-read the question more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Grover
3 months ago
I was going with B) OFDMA, but now I'm not so sure. Isn't UL MU-MIMO the feature that specifically helps with large data uploads?
upvoted 0 times
Milly
1 months ago
A: UL MU-MIMO allows for simultaneous data transmission to multiple clients, which can help with large data uploads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
2 months ago
B: Really? I was leaning towards OFDMA. What makes you think UL MU-MIMO is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
2 months ago
A: I think UL MU-MIMO is the feature you're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgie
3 months ago
I think D) UL MU-MIMO is the right answer. It allows spatially separated clients to access the channel while providing throughput gains for large data uploads.
upvoted 0 times
Kenneth
2 months ago
UL-TXBF might not be as effective as UL MU-MIMO for this specific requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
2 months ago
DL MU-MIMO could also be a good choice to consider for improving throughput.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
3 months ago
I agree, UL MU-MIMO is the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvia
4 months ago
I'm not sure, but UL MU-MIMO could also be a good option for providing throughput gains for large data uploads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
4 months ago
I agree with Carey, DL MU-MIMO allows for simultaneous access to the channel by spatially separated clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carey
4 months ago
I think the answer is C) DL MU-MIMO.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel