New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HPE7-A02 Exam - Topic 14 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE7-A02 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 14
[All HPE7-A02 Questions]

What is a use case for running periodic subnet scans on devices from HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM)?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Running periodic subnet scans on devices from HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) can be used to gather DHCP fingerprints, which help determine a client's device category and operating system. DHCP fingerprints are unique patterns in DHCP request packets that provide valuable information about the device type and OS, assisting in device profiling and policy enforcement.

1.DHCP Fingerprinting: This technique captures specific details from DHCP packets to identify the type and operating system of a device.

2.Device Profiling: By running subnet scans, CPPM can continuously update its device database with accurate profiles, ensuring that policies are applied correctly based on the device type.

3.Network Visibility: Regular scanning helps maintain up-to-date visibility of all devices on the network, improving security and management.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Miss
17 days ago
C) is crucial for troubleshooting client access issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
22 days ago
Totally agree, B) helps keep the network secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
27 days ago
A) is super useful for categorizing devices!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
1 month ago
B is the obvious choice here. Keeping your network secure is no joke, people!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
1 month ago
Haha, option D? Really? I think that's just a fancy way of saying "let's spy on our users!"
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
1 month ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Wouldn't option D be useful for getting more info on Windows clients? Seems like a good idea to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sang
2 months ago
I agree, option B is the way to go. Gotta keep those rogue devices in check!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
2 months ago
I vaguely remember something about WMI and Windows clients, so option D sounds plausible, but I don't think it's the primary use case for periodic scans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
2 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C since authentication issues are a common problem, but I can't recall if that's specifically tied to subnet scans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katy
2 months ago
I remember practicing a question about device identification, so option A seems familiar, but I feel like it might not cover the full scope of subnet scans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
2 months ago
This is a good question to test our understanding of CPPM capabilities. I'm pretty confident option B is the right answer - the scans are meant to detect devices that aren't complying with the defined security policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. Are they asking about the primary purpose of running these scans, or just a potential use case? I'll have to think it through carefully before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
3 months ago
Option B is the correct answer. Periodic subnet scans help detect devices that fail to comply with CPPM posture policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
3 months ago
Ah, I remember learning about this in class. Periodic subnet scans with CPPM are used to identify devices that aren't meeting the posture policies defined in the system. Option B looks like the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salina
3 months ago
I think option B makes sense because it relates to compliance checks, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the main reason for subnet scans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
3 months ago
D is useful for Windows environments, but not as broad.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
4 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The options all seem related to CPPM functionality, but I'm not totally clear on the specific use case they're asking about. I might need to review my notes on CPPM before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
4 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward networking question. I think I'll go with option B - it seems to be the most direct answer about using CPPM to detect non-compliant devices.
upvoted 0 times
Lenna
3 months ago
I like option A too, but B feels more relevant for CPPM.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel