New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HPE6-A78 Exam - Topic 6 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A78 exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 6
[All HPE6-A78 Questions]

You are configuring ArubaOS-CX switches to tunnel client traffic to an Aruba Mobility Controller (MC). What should you do to enhance security for control channel communications between the switches and the MC?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Nguyet
3 months ago
UBT zones are cool, but I’d stick with certificates for sure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
3 months ago
I disagree, option D doesn't really enhance security like the others.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
3 months ago
Wait, can you really just use a long key? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
4 months ago
I think option C is better, certificates add extra security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
4 months ago
Definitely go with option B, a strong PAPI key is crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
4 months ago
I recall that the interface assignment for the UBT client VLAN is important, but I can't remember how it relates to enhancing security for control channels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecilia
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the UBT zones; I thought they were more about traffic management than security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
4 months ago
I think I practiced a question similar to this, and I feel like installing certificates and enabling CPsec was emphasized for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vilma
5 months ago
I remember something about using a security key for PAPI, but I'm not entirely sure if it was the best option for securing control traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
5 months ago
I think the right approach here is to install certificates on the switches and make sure CPsec is enabled on the MC, as described in option C. That will provide strong end-to-end encryption and authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
5 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The options all seem related to securing the control channel, but I'm not confident which one is the best approach. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catrice
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The answer is clearly option B - configuring a long, random PAPI security key. That will ensure secure communications between the switches and the MC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the different options. I'll need to review the ArubaOS-CX and Mobility Controller configuration details to figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
5 months ago
This looks like a straightforward security question. I think the key is to secure the control channel between the switches and the MC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
5 months ago
I remember something about "Unstable" indicating that some tests failed, but I can't recall the exact context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the template class syntax, but I think I can figure this out. I'll need to pay close attention to the details of the code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
5 months ago
I'm not completely sure, but I think the best option is to upload the file to a virus checking engine? That way we can see if it's really a threat or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
5 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question on API security best practices. I'm confident I can identify the two correct methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnathon
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of this question. I'm not sure if option B, improved performance, is actually an example of fraud or not. I'll have to re-read the question stem carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel