Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Guidewire ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts Exam - Topic 5 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Guidewire's ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 5
[All ClaimCenter-Business-Analysts Questions]

Succeed Insurance needs the ability to associate a primary hospital with an injury incident if the injured party received treatment. When treatment is needed, the primary hospital name should display on the injury incident screen along with other details about the injury and treatment received.

The primary hospital should be added to the injury incident in one of the following ways:

. Select the name from a list of medical care organizations already associated with the claim.

. Enter the contact details directly in the incident.

. Search the Address Book from the incident to locate a hospital.

Which two requirements must be documented to associate the primary hospital with the claim? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

To implement the functionality of associating a specific contact (the 'Primary Hospital') with an entity (the 'Injury Incident') in Guidewire ClaimCenter, two core configuration components are required:

A new primary hospital role (Option B): In ClaimCenter, the relationship between a Contact and a Claim (or Incident) is defined by a Role. While the contact itself might be a 'Medical Care Organization' (existing subtype), the context of its relationship to this specific incident is that it is the 'Primary Hospital'. Defining this role allows the system to distinguish this hospital from other medical providers on the same claim.

A new field on the incident screen (Option C): To allow the user to select, add, or view this contact, a UI element (specifically a Claim Contact Picker or Input widget) must be added to the Injury Incident screen. This field will be configured to store the relationship and allows the user to perform the required actions: selecting from existing contacts (filtered by the role), entering new ones, or searching the Address Book.

Why other options are incorrect:

A (New Subtype): The base product already includes the MedicalCareOrg contact subtype, which is sufficient to store hospital data. Creating a new subtype is unnecessary unless the data structure (fields) of a hospital is fundamentally different from other medical providers.

D (Address Book Field): Contacts in the Address Book are typically identified by tags or their Subtype, not by adding a custom field just to identify them as a vendor/hospital.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Celestine
3 days ago
Wait, do we really need a new field for that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
8 days ago
Totally agree, the role is essential!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
13 days ago
A new primary hospital role is definitely needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
18 days ago
I feel like the new field on the incident screen is definitely necessary, but I can't recall if we need to identify a vendor as a hospital in the Address Book.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
24 days ago
I'm a bit confused about whether we need a new Hospital contact subtype or a new field in the Address Book. They both seem relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamika
29 days ago
I remember a practice question that mentioned adding a new primary hospital role, so that might be one of the requirements here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
1 month ago
I think we need to document a new field on the incident screen to add a contact with a role, but I'm not sure about the second requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel