Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam - Topic 2 Question 90 Discussion

You are increasing your usage of Cloud VPN between on-premises and GCP, and you want to support more traffic than a single tunnel can handle. You want to increase the available bandwidth using Cloud VPN.What should you do?
B) Create two VPN tunnels on the same Cloud VPN gateway that point to the same destination VPN gateway IP address.
A) Double the MTU on your on-premises VPN gateway from 1460 bytes to 2920 bytes.
C) Add a second on-premises VPN gateway with a different public IP address. Create a second tunnel on the existing Cloud VPN gateway that forwards the same IP range, but points at the new on-premises gateway IP.
D) Add a second Cloud VPN gateway in a different region than the existing VPN gateway. Create a new tunnel on the second Cloud VPN gateway that forwards the same IP range, but points to the existing on-premises VPN gateway IP address.

Google Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam - Topic 2 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Network Engineer exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 2
[All Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions]

You are increasing your usage of Cloud VPN between on-premises and GCP, and you want to support more traffic than a single tunnel can handle. You want to increase the available bandwidth using Cloud VPN.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Jules at Aug 23, 2024, 10:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jillian
7 months ago
D seems like overkill for just increasing bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
8 months ago
Wait, doubling the MTU? That sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
8 months ago
A definitely won't help with bandwidth, just saying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
8 months ago
I think C could work too, but not sure if it's necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
8 months ago
B is the way to go for more bandwidth!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
9 months ago
I feel like option D could work too, especially if the second gateway is in a different region. It might help with redundancy as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where adding a second gateway was the solution. Option C sounds familiar, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but doubling the MTU seems risky. I think it could cause fragmentation issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
9 months ago
I remember something about creating multiple tunnels to increase bandwidth, so maybe option B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
9 months ago
Option B seems like the simplest approach - just create two tunnels pointing to the same on-premises gateway. That should give me the bandwidth boost I need without too much additional complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the differences between the multiple tunnel options. I'll need to think through the implications of each one carefully before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
9 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about increasing bandwidth for a Cloud VPN connection. I think the key is to create multiple tunnels, so I'm leaning towards options B or C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
9 months ago
I'm not sure about doubling the MTU on the on-premises gateway. That could cause compatibility issues, so I'm hesitant to go with option A. The multiple tunnel approaches seem safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover a range of different activities, so I'll need to think carefully about which two are most appropriate for the first Sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old conundrum of bandwidth vs. complexity. Maybe we could just send the data through a wormhole instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
1 year ago
Why don't we just duct tape the on-premises VPN gateway and call it a day? I'm sure that would work just as well!
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
1 year ago
Option D looks interesting, but I'm not sure if adding a second Cloud VPN gateway in a different region is really necessary for this use case. Might be overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about doubling the MTU on the on-premises VPN gateway. That seems a bit risky and might cause compatibility issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
1 year ago
Option C seems like a good choice. Adding a second on-premises VPN gateway and creating a new tunnel on the existing Cloud VPN gateway could provide more flexibility and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
Lonny
1 year ago
And creating a new tunnel on the existing Cloud VPN gateway would increase available bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
1 year ago
I agree, having a second on-premises VPN gateway could help distribute the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
1 year ago
It would definitely provide more flexibility and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
1 year ago
Option C seems like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolland
1 year ago
I think option B is the way to go. Creating two VPN tunnels on the same Cloud VPN gateway is a simple and effective solution to increase the available bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
Cathrine
1 year ago
I think option B is better because it's easier to manage and configure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
1 year ago
But wouldn't adding a second on-premises VPN gateway with a different public IP address also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
1 year ago
I agree, option B seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melinda
1 year ago
But wouldn't adding a second on-premises VPN gateway with a different public IP address be a better option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe we should create two VPN tunnels on the same Cloud VPN gateway.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
1 year ago
I think we should double the MTU on our on-premises VPN gateway.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel