Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam - Topic 2 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Network Engineer exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 2
[All Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions]

You are increasing your usage of Cloud VPN between on-premises and GCP, and you want to support more traffic than a single tunnel can handle. You want to increase the available bandwidth using Cloud VPN.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Jules at Aug 23, 2024, 10:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jillian
6 months ago
D seems like overkill for just increasing bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
6 months ago
Wait, doubling the MTU? That sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
6 months ago
A definitely won't help with bandwidth, just saying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
7 months ago
I think C could work too, but not sure if it's necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
7 months ago
B is the way to go for more bandwidth!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
7 months ago
I feel like option D could work too, especially if the second gateway is in a different region. It might help with redundancy as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
7 months ago
I practiced a similar question where adding a second gateway was the solution. Option C sounds familiar, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanora
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but doubling the MTU seems risky. I think it could cause fragmentation issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
8 months ago
I remember something about creating multiple tunnels to increase bandwidth, so maybe option B is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
8 months ago
Option B seems like the simplest approach - just create two tunnels pointing to the same on-premises gateway. That should give me the bandwidth boost I need without too much additional complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the differences between the multiple tunnel options. I'll need to think through the implications of each one carefully before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
8 months ago
This looks like a straightforward question about increasing bandwidth for a Cloud VPN connection. I think the key is to create multiple tunnels, so I'm leaning towards options B or C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
8 months ago
I'm not sure about doubling the MTU on the on-premises gateway. That could cause compatibility issues, so I'm hesitant to go with option A. The multiple tunnel approaches seem safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover a range of different activities, so I'll need to think carefully about which two are most appropriate for the first Sprint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
1 year ago
Ah, the age-old conundrum of bandwidth vs. complexity. Maybe we could just send the data through a wormhole instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
1 year ago
Why don't we just duct tape the on-premises VPN gateway and call it a day? I'm sure that would work just as well!
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
1 year ago
Option D looks interesting, but I'm not sure if adding a second Cloud VPN gateway in a different region is really necessary for this use case. Might be overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about doubling the MTU on the on-premises VPN gateway. That seems a bit risky and might cause compatibility issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
1 year ago
Option C seems like a good choice. Adding a second on-premises VPN gateway and creating a new tunnel on the existing Cloud VPN gateway could provide more flexibility and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
Lonny
11 months ago
And creating a new tunnel on the existing Cloud VPN gateway would increase available bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
11 months ago
I agree, having a second on-premises VPN gateway could help distribute the traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
12 months ago
It would definitely provide more flexibility and redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
12 months ago
Option C seems like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolland
1 year ago
I think option B is the way to go. Creating two VPN tunnels on the same Cloud VPN gateway is a simple and effective solution to increase the available bandwidth.
upvoted 0 times
Cathrine
11 months ago
I think option B is better because it's easier to manage and configure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
11 months ago
But wouldn't adding a second on-premises VPN gateway with a different public IP address also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
12 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melinda
1 year ago
But wouldn't adding a second on-premises VPN gateway with a different public IP address be a better option?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe we should create two VPN tunnels on the same Cloud VPN gateway.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
1 year ago
I think we should double the MTU on our on-premises VPN gateway.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel