Discuss Google Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam Topic 2 Question 113

You need to create the technical architecture for hybrid connectivity from your data center to Google Cloud This will be managed by a partner. You want to follow Google-recommended practices for production-level applications. What should you do?

AAsk the partner to install two security appliances in the data center. Configure one VPN connection from each of these devices to Google
Cloud, and ensure that the VPN devices on-premises are in separate racks on separate power and cooling systems.

BConfigure two Partner Interconnect connections in one metropolitan area (metro). Make sure the Interconnect connections are placed in
different metro edge availability domains. Configure two VLAN attachments in a single region, and configure regional dynamic routing on
the VPC

CConfigure two Partner Interconnect connections in one metro and two connections in another metro Make sure the Interconnect
connections are placed in different metro edge availability domains. Configure two VLAN attachments in one region and two VLAN
attachments in another region, and configure global dynamic routing on the VPC

DConfigure two Partner Interconnect connections in one metro and two connections in another metro. Make sure the Interconnect connections are placed in different metro edge availability domains. Configure two VLAN attachments in one region and two VLAN attachments in another region, and configure regional dynamic routing on the VPC.

Suggested Answer: D

'Google's recommended practices for production-level applications' and then see overview of these 2 pages- https://cloud.google.com/network-connectivity/docs/interconnect/tutorials/production-level-overview and https://cloud.google.com/network-connectivity/docs/interconnect/tutorials/non-critical-overview .

Get Premium Professional Cloud Network Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

29 comments · newest first

Colton 6 months ago

I’m leaning towards C as well. More connections mean better failover.

Marilynn 7 months ago

D is interesting, but I prefer C for global routing benefits.

Oretha 7 months ago

A is too basic for production. We need more reliability.

Jamal 7 months ago

Option B could work too, but I feel it lacks the extra metro connections.

Barrett 7 months ago

I think option C is the best. It offers redundancy across different metros.

Alease 7 months ago

Two connections in different metros? Is that really necessary?

Effie 8 months ago

D sounds overkill, but I guess it covers all bases.

Kristel 8 months ago

Wait, why not just go with A? Seems simpler.

Alfreda 8 months ago

I think C is the best choice for global reach!

Taryn 8 months ago

Option B is solid for redundancy.

Britt 9 months ago

Option B? Really? That's like trying to build a house with one hand tied behind your back.

Selma 9 months ago

Option D has my vote. Redundancy is key, and this option covers all the bases.

Jeffrey 9 months ago

Option A is a bit too simple for a production-level setup. Gotta go with the more robust solutions.

Sue 9 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the routing configurations. I thought regional dynamic routing was sufficient, but maybe global is better for redundancy?

Flo 9 months ago

I practiced a similar question about interconnects, and I feel like option D might be overkill with the regional routing.

King 9 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think having connections in different metro areas could help with failover. Maybe option C is the best?

Adelle 10 months ago

I remember that Google recommends having redundancy, so options B and C seem more aligned with that principle.

Iola 10 months ago

I've got a strategy in mind. I think the best approach is to go with option D, as it seems to hit all the key requirements - two Partner Interconnect connections in separate metros, VLAN attachments in two regions, and regional dynamic routing. This should provide the redundancy and reliability that the question is looking for.

Kris 10 months ago

Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm a bit confused about the differences between the Partner Interconnect options and how the VLAN attachments and dynamic routing work. I'll need to do some research to make sure I fully understand the implications of each approach.

Nickole 10 months ago

I'm leaning towards Option C. Spreading out the Interconnect connections across multiple metros seems like a smart move.

Thaddeus 11 months ago

I agree, C seems solid. Global dynamic routing is a plus.

Nieves 11 months ago

Option D seems like the most comprehensive and reliable solution. Gotta love that regional dynamic routing!

Carmelina 11 months ago

Okay, let's see. We need to create a hybrid connectivity solution from the data center to Google Cloud, and it needs to be managed by a partner. I think the key is to follow the Google-recommended practices, so I'll focus on that as I review the options.

Dorinda 11 months ago

This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly. I'll need to review the Google-recommended practices for production-level applications to ensure I'm following the best approach.

Fairy 6 months ago

↳ replying to Dorinda

Yeah, but we should double-check the requirements first. Can't rush this!

Josephine 6 months ago

↳ replying to Dorinda

I like option D for its balance. Two in each metro is a strong choice.

Linette 6 months ago

↳ replying to Dorinda

True, but it might complicate things. Regional routing seems simpler.

Antonio 6 months ago

↳ replying to Dorinda

Agreed! But what about option C? More redundancy could be better.

Lynna 10 months ago

↳ replying to Dorinda

I think option B is solid. Two connections in different availability domains make sense.

Google Professional Cloud Network Engineer Exam - Topic 2 Question 113 Discussion