Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Exam - Topic 8 Question 49 Discussion

You use a multiple step Cloud Build pipeline to build and deploy your application to Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). You want to integrate with a third-party monitoring platform by performing a HTTP POST of the build information to a webhook. You want to minimize the development effort. What should you do?
D) Create a Cloud Pub/Sub push subscription to the Cloud Build cloud-builds PubSub topic to HTTP POST the build information to a webhook.
A) Add logic to each Cloud Build step to HTTP POST the build information to a webhook.
B) Add a new step at the end of the pipeline in Cloud Build to HTTP POST the build information to a webhook.
C) Use Stackdriver Logging to create a logs-based metric from the Cloud Buitd logs. Create an Alert with a Webhook notification type.

Google Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Exam - Topic 8 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 8
[All Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Questions]

You use a multiple step Cloud Build pipeline to build and deploy your application to Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE). You want to integrate with a third-party monitoring platform by performing a HTTP POST of the build information to a webhook. You want to minimize the development effort. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Stephaine at Jun 27, 2022, 05:21 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Madonna
7 months ago
A whole new step just for a POST? That feels like overkill!
upvoted 0 times
...
Barabara
7 months ago
I think D could be a good choice too, but it sounds complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
7 months ago
Wait, why not just use Stackdriver? Seems more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
8 months ago
I agree, adding a new step is less hassle!
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
8 months ago
Option B seems like the simplest way to do it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
8 months ago
I feel like option A might be too much work since it requires adding logic to every step, which could complicate things unnecessarily.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnson
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to integrate with a monitoring tool, and I think option D could be a good choice if we want to decouple the webhook from the build process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
8 months ago
I think option B makes the most sense since it adds the HTTP POST step at the end, which minimizes changes to existing steps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
8 months ago
I'm not sure about option C; I remember something about Stackdriver, but it seems like it might be more complex than just posting directly to a webhook.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
8 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key details are that it's an annual budget that adjusts the current year's results for growth and inflation. That sounds like a rolling budget to me - the other options don't quite fit those criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
8 months ago
Hmm, sampling error can definitely skew the results of a job analysis. I'm thinking the key is to consider how the sample might not accurately reflect the full population of incumbents or supervisors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused here. The steps seem to overlap with several different methodologies. I'll need to review my notes on the various penetration testing frameworks to make sure I select the right one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel