Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Exam - Topic 5 Question 29 Discussion

You support a service with a well-defined Service Level Objective (SLO). Over the previous 6 months, your service has consistently met its SLO and customer satisfaction has been consistently high. Most of your service's operations tasks are automated and few repetitive tasks occur frequently. You want to optimize the balance between reliability and deployment velocity while following site reliability engineering best practices. What should you do? (Choose two.)
D) Get the product team to prioritize reliability work over new features. and E) Change the implementation of your Service Level Indicators (SLIs) to increase coverage.
A) Make the service's SLO more strict.
B) Increase the service's deployment velocity and/or risk.
C) Shift engineering time to other services that need more reliability.

Google Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Exam - Topic 5 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 5
[All Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Questions]

You support a service with a well-defined Service Level Objective (SLO). Over the previous 6 months, your service has consistently met its SLO and customer satisfaction has been consistently high. Most of your service's operations tasks are automated and few repetitive tasks occur frequently. You want to optimize the balance between reliability and deployment velocity while following site reliability engineering best practices. What should you do? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D, E

by Maryann at May 05, 2022, 11:56 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Kanisha
9 months ago
Changing SLIs for better coverage could really help too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
9 months ago
Wait, why would we make the SLO stricter? That sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
9 months ago
But shouldn't we focus on reliability first?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
9 months ago
Totally agree, we need to keep up with new features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
9 months ago
I think increasing deployment velocity is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
10 months ago
I wonder if prioritizing reliability work over new features is really the right choice. It seems like a trade-off we might have covered in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
10 months ago
I feel like making the SLO stricter might not be the best move since customer satisfaction is high. We should focus on maintaining that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
10 months ago
I remember we discussed how increasing deployment velocity can sometimes lead to more risks, but if the SLO is already being met, maybe it's worth it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
10 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think shifting engineering time to other services could help balance things out. It sounds familiar from a practice question we did.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
10 months ago
This looks like a classic high-throughput scenario. I'd go with option B - using SQS to decouple the order processing from the web application. That way we can scale the order processing independently and handle spikes in traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know dynamic address groups are used to automatically update policy based on changes in the virtual environment, but I'm not familiar with the specific options for registering the tags. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel