New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Exam - Topic 12 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 12
[All Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Questions]

You support a multi-region web service running on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) behind a Global HTTP'S Cloud Load Balancer (CLB). For legacy reasons, user requests first go through a third-party Content Delivery Network (CDN). which then routes traffic to the CLB. You have already implemented an availability Service Level Indicator (SLI) at the CLB level. However, you want to increase coverage in case of a potential load balancer misconfiguration. CDN failure, or other global networking catastrophe. Where should you measure this new SLI?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Audry
4 months ago
A synthetic client? That sounds a bit overkill, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
4 months ago
C could be useful, but not as proactive as E.
upvoted 0 times
...
Britt
4 months ago
Wait, why would you use A? Seems too indirect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
4 months ago
Definitely agree with D too, health checks are crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
5 months ago
I think E is a solid choice for monitoring.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
5 months ago
I feel like metrics from application servers could be useful, but I’m not sure if they would cover CDN failures effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
5 months ago
GKE health checks seem relevant, but I wonder if they would capture issues that happen before reaching the load balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
5 months ago
I remember we discussed measuring SLIs at different points in the architecture, but I'm not sure if application logs would give us the coverage we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
5 months ago
I think using a synthetic client could be a good option since it simulates user requests, but I’m not entirely confident about how often it should run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doug
5 months ago
Hmm, this question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the difference between the approaches. Let me think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
5 months ago
I like the idea of using a combination of workflow rules and formula fields in option D. That could be an efficient way to populate key fields without too much manual effort. I'll make sure to understand how those features work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
5 months ago
Hmm, this question seems to be asking about the advantages of load balancing. I'll need to think carefully about the key benefits it provides.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel